Validation of the 12‐item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in individuals with schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and diabetes in Singapore
Authors:
Open Access
- 30 November 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 18 (11) , e0294908
Abstract
Background: There is limited evidence on the reliability and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in an Asian patient population with mental and physical disorders. The current study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 among patients with schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and diabetes. Methods: A total of 1076 patients (M = 40.9 years, SD = 14.7) were recruited from the outpatient clinics of a tertiary psychiatric hospital and a primary care clinic. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability, structural validity, convergent validity, agreement, and floor and ceiling effects were examined. Results: Our confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the 1-factor model fits our data. Multigroup CFA demonstrated metric and scalar invariance, indicating the scores can be compared across the four conditions. The WHODAS 2.0 scale had excellent reliability in the overall sample and good to excellent reliability across conditions. The test-retest reliability and agreement between self-administered and interviewer-administered modes were good. The WHODAS 2.0 scores had moderate to strong correlations with the Social and Occupational Functioning Scale and the Sheehan Disability Scale scores in the overall sample and across four conditions. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the WHODAS 2.0 is a valid tool to measure functioning and disability in those with schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, and diabetes in an Asian patient population.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Medical Research Council (NMRC Grant Number: MOH-HSRG-MH17Nov-0001.)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factor structure and longitudinal invariance of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in adult women: application in a population-based sample of mothers of children with epilepsyArchives of Women's Mental Health, 2013
- How Valid and Responsive Are Generic Health Status Measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in Schizophrenia? A Systematic ReviewValue in Health, 2011
- Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2010
- Psychometric properties of the twelve item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) in Spanish primary care patients with a first major depressive episodeJournal of Affective Disorders, 2010
- Measuring disability across cultures — the psychometric properties of the WHODAS II in older people from seven low‐ and middle‐income countries. The 10/66 Dementia Research Group population‐based surveyInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2010
- Normative Data for the 12 Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0PLOS ONE, 2009
- The Impact of Comorbidity of Mental and Physical Conditions on Role Disability in the US Adult Household PopulationArchives of General Psychiatry, 2007
- Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement InvarianceStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002
- The measurement of disabilityInternational Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1996
- Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of TestsPsychometrika, 1951