Roving Divers Surveying Fish in Fixed Areas Capture Similar Patterns in Biogeography but Different Estimates of Density When Compared With Belt Transects
Open Access
- 7 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Marine Science
- Vol. 7
Abstract
Fish abundance and diversity are core measurements taken by many nearshore marine monitoring projects. The most common approaches for counting fish include belt transects and timed counts by roving divers, each with its own limitations. Here we evaluate a fish counting method developed by the Channel Islands National Park’s Kelp Forest Monitoring Program (KFMP), in which roving observers make fish counts that are standardized both by the time taken (30 min) and the area sampled (2,000 m2). This method is potentially very useful because it combines an advantage of simple timed counts – the ability to rapidly sample a large area – with the potential to calculate area-specific density of fish, not just their relative abundance. However, the method has not been comprehensively evaluated and it is uncertain whether fish can effectively be counted in such a large target area within the allotted time. Fortunately, many sites surveyed with this method are also sampled with a more standard fish counting approach of belt transects, both by the KFMP and by the Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans. Here we compare estimates of fish density obtained through the area-standardized roving diver method and belt transect methods. In paired samples we find substantial and species-specific differences in densities estimated by each method. Considering all fish taxa together we find that roving divers are likely under-sampling the target area. Despite considerable species-level variation, the different methods produce similar estimates of average diversity and find similar regional and temporal patterns in fish abundance, demonstrating that they can successfully be used in parallel even if the datasets cannot be easily combined. These analyses can guide the interpretation of roving diver data for basic research and management decisions.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Park Service
- Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantifying Relative Diver Effects in Underwater Visual CensusesPLOS ONE, 2011
- Incorporating biogeography into evaluations of the Channel Islands marine reserve networkProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Accounting for detectability in reef-fish biodiversity estimatesMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2008
- Entropy and diversityOikos, 2006
- Impact of observers’ experience level on counts of fishes in underwater visual surveysMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2006
- Patterns of coastal eddy circulation and abundance of pelagic juvenile fish in the Santa Barbara Channel, California, USAMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2002
- Visual census methods underestimate density and diversity of cryptic reef fishesJournal of Fish Biology, 2001
- Detection of spatial variability in relative density of fishes:comparison of visual census, angling, and baited underwater videoMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2000
- Surface Circulation in the Santa Barbara ChannelOceanography, 1996
- A Preliminary Report on a Method of Estimating Reef Fish PopulationsThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1954