Predictive Engagement: An Efficient Metric For Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Systems
Preprint
Abstract
User engagement is a critical metric for evaluating the quality of open-domain dialogue systems. Prior work has focused on conversation-level engagement by using heuristically constructed features such as the number of turns and the total time of the conversation. In this paper, we investigate the possibility and efficacy of estimating utterance-level engagement and define a novel metric, {\em predictive engagement}, for automatic evaluation of open-domain dialogue systems. Our experiments demonstrate that (1) human annotators have high agreement on assessing utterance-level engagement scores; (2) conversation-level engagement scores can be predicted from properly aggregated utterance-level engagement scores. Furthermore, we show that the utterance-level engagement scores can be learned from data. These scores can improve automatic evaluation metrics for open-domain dialogue systems, as shown by correlation with human judgements. This suggests that predictive engagement can be used as a real-time feedback for training better dialogue models.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding2019
- Towards Coherent and Engaging Spoken Dialog Response Generation Using Automatic Conversation Evaluators2019
- Engagement Recognition in Spoken Dialogue via Neural Network by Aggregating Different Annotators' Models2018
- Alexa Prize — State of the Art in Conversational AIAI Magazine, 2018
- Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responses2017
- cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of CorrelationsPLOS ONE, 2015