Do Interventions in an ICU Affect the Predictive Ability of Pediatric Index of Mortality and Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 Scores in a Tertiary Care Hospital?
Authors:
- Jhuma SankarJSJhuma Sankar
- Arnav ChandelACArnav Chandel
- Nand Kishore DubeyNDNand Kishore Dubey
- Vishnubhatla SreenivasVSVishnubhatla Sreenivas
- Mari Jeeva SankarMSMari Jeeva Sankar
- 1 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 14 (2) , e70-e76
Abstract
Our objective was to evaluate the effect of interventions in the initial period of stabilization (i.e., at 4 hrs) on the predictive ability of Pediatric Index of Mortality and Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 scores and to evaluate their performance in our ICU. Prospective observational study. PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Consecutive children aged 2 months to 17 yr admitted to our ICU from June 2010 to July 2011 were included. None. We prospectively recorded the baseline characteristics, variables of Pediatric Index of Mortality and Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 at 1 and 4 hrs after admission, and the outcome data in a predesigned proforma. We compared the performance of the scores at these two time points by calculating their discriminative ability and calibration as measured by the area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, respectively.Of the 282 children enrolled, 93 (32.9%) died. The median (interquartile) age of the study patients was 3.5 yr (0.8, 10). The major reasons for ICU admission as well as mortality were sepsis/severe sepsis and cardiac and neurological illnesses. The area under curves for Pediatric Index of Mortality at 4 and 1 hrs were 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.66-0.79) and 0.70 (0.63-0.77), respectively. The corresponding values for Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 were 0.72 (0.66-0.79) and 0.71 (0.64-0.78), respectively. The goodness-of-fit test showed a good calibration across deciles of risk for the two scores at both the time points (p > 0.1 for all). The calibration across different age and diagnostic subgroups was also good. Interventions in the first 4 hrs did not affect the predictive ability of Pediatric Index of Mortality and Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 scores. The 4-hr scores may be used in place of the 1-hr score, particularly in units where scoring is not possible with in the 1-hr time frame.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 Scoring System in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, BarbadosJournal of Tropical Pediatrics, 2010
- Management of septic shock: Where do we stand?Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2008
- Performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), and PIM2 in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing countryPediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- The suitability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PIM2, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), and PRISM III for monitoring the quality of pediatric intensive care in Australia and New ZealandPediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- A comparison of three scoring systems for mortality risk among retrieved intensive care patientsArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2002
- Calibration of the paediatric index of mortality in UK paediatric intensive care unitsArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2001
- Poor discriminatory performance of the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score in a South African intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 1996
- PRISM IIICritical Care Medicine, 1996
- Pediatric risk of mortality scoring overestimates severity of illness in infantsCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) scoreCritical Care Medicine, 1988