Distributing the European structural and investment funds from a conflicting claims approach
Open Access
- 23 December 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Review of Regional Research
- Vol. 42 (1) , 23-47
Abstract
In order to support economic development across all European Union regions, €351.8 billion –almost a third of the total EU budget– has been set aside for the Cohesion Policy during the 2014–2020 period. The distribution of this budget is made through five main structural and investment funds, after long and difficult negotiations among the EU member states. This paper analyzes the problem of allocating the limited resources of the European Regional Development Fund as a conflicting claims problem. Specifically, we attempt to show how the conflicting claims approach fits this actual problem, and we propose alternative ways of distributing the budget via (i) claims solutions or (ii) the imposition of bounds (guarantees) to each of the regions. By applying this approach we also show that there is a claims solution that performs better than the others by reducing inequality and promoting convergence to a greater degree. It is clear that political bargaining will always be part of the allocation process. However, having an intuitive initial proposal may help politicians to find the best agreement. To that effect, we propose the use of a claims solution as a way to find an initial proposal for future policy changes concerning the allocations of the EU structural funds.Keywords
Funding Information
- Universitat Rovira i Virgili
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Weighted bankruptcy rules and the museum pass problemEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2011
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claimsInternational Journal of Game Theory, 2011
- Going NUTS: The effect of EU Structural Funds on regional performanceJournal of Public Economics, 2010
- Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approachesRegional Science and Urban Economics, 2010
- European Regional Structural Funds: How Large is the Influence of Politics on the Allocation Process?JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2010
- Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 RegionsRegional Studies, 2004
- Chapter 6 Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing2002
- 'Europeanisation' of Regional Development Policies? Linking the Multi-Level Governance Approach with Theories of Policy Learning and Policy ChangeSSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the TalmudJournal of Economic Theory, 1985
- A problem of rights arbitration from the TalmudMathematical Social Sciences, 1982