Diagnostic Crossover and Outcome Predictors in Eating Disorders According to DSM-IV and DSM-V Proposed Criteria: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study
Authors:
- Carolina Lo SauroCSCarolina Lo Sauro
- Edoardo MannucciEMEdoardo Mannucci
- Claudia RavaldiClaudia Ravaldi
- Carlo Maria RotellaCRCarlo Maria Rotella
- Carlo FaravelliCFCarlo Faravelli
- Valdo RiccaVRValdo Ricca
- 1 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Psychosomatic Medicine
- Vol. 73 (3) , 270-279
Abstract
To evaluate in a 6-year follow-up study the course of a large clinical sample of patients with eating disorders (EDs) who were treated with individual cognitive behavior therapy. The diagnostic crossover, recovery, and relapses were assessed, applying both Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) and the DSM-V proposed criteria. Patients with EDs move in and out of illness states over time, display frequent relapses, show a relevant lifetime psychiatric comorbidity, and migrate between different diagnoses. A total of 793 patients (including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, and EDs not otherwise specified) were evaluated on the first day of admission, at the end of treatment, 3 years after the end of treatment, and 3 years after the first follow-up. Clinical data were collected through a face-to-face interview; diagnosis was performed by means of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire was applied. A consistent rate of relapse and crossover between the different diagnoses over time was observed. Mood disorders comorbidity has been found to be an important determinant of diagnostic instability, whereas the severity of shape concern represented a relevant outcome modifier. Using the DSM-V proposed criteria, most patients of EDs not otherwise specified were reclassified, so that the large majority of ED patients seeking treatment would be included in full-blown diagnoses. Among EDs, there are different subgroups of patients displaying various courses and outcomes. The diagnostic instability involves the large majority of patients. An integration of categorical and dimensional approaches could improve the psychopathological investigation and the treatment choices.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Threshold and Subthreshold Anorexia Nervosa: A Three-Year Follow-Up StudyPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 2010
- The relationship between eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) and officially recognized eating disorders: Meta-analysis and implications for DSM.Psychological Bulletin, 2009
- Underweight eating disorder without over‐evaluation of shape and weight: Atypical anorexia nervosa?International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2008
- The severity and status of eating disorder NOS: Implications for DSM-VBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2007
- Eating disorder not otherwise specified in an inpatient unit: the impact of altering the DSM‐IV criteria for anorexia and bulimia nervosaEuropean Eating Disorders Review, 2007
- The prevalence of eating disorders not otherwise specifiedInternational Journal of Eating Disorders, 2006
- Clinical Epidemiology of Eating Disorders: Results from the Sesto Fiorentino StudyPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 2006
- Partial eating disorders among adolescents: A reviewJournal of Adolescent Health, 2005
- Eating disorder NOS (EDNOS): an example of the troublesome “not otherwise specified” (NOS) category in DSM-IVBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2005
- Psychopathological and clinical features of outpatients with an eating disorder not otherwise specifiedEating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 2001