Reflections on the Safety and Stability of the Second‐Generation Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Response
Authors:
- Penelope J. AllenPAPenelope J. Allen
- Maria KolicMKMaria Kolic
- Elizabeth K. BaglinEBElizabeth K. Baglin
- Samuel A. TitchenerSTSamuel A. Titchener
- Jessica KvansakulJKJessica Kvansakul
- David A. X. NayagamDNDavid A. X. Nayagam
- Jonathan YeohJYJonathan Yeoh
- Robert J. BriggsRBRobert J. Briggs
- Joel VillalobosJVJoel Villalobos
- Christopher E. WilliamsCWChristopher E. Williams
- Myra B. McGuinnessMMMyra B. McGuinness
- Chi D. LuuCLChi D. Luu
- 29 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
- Vol. 54 (1) , 171-173
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1082358)
- State Government of Victoria
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reflections on the Safety and Stability of the Second‐Generation Suprachoroidal Retinal ProsthesisClinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2026
- Second‐Generation (44‐Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Surgical Stability and Safety During a 2‐Year Clinical TrialClinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2025
- A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode–Tissue InterfaceTranslational Vision Science & Technology, 2022
- A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial ResultsTranslational Vision Science & Technology, 2021
- Functional Vision in the Real-World Environment With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal ProsthesisTranslational Vision Science & Technology, 2021