Is it time for a paradigm shift? Tailored online video education instead of pretest genetic counseling facilitates high genetic test uptake and informed choice for adults seeking cardiovascular genetic testing

Authors:
Preprint
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background: Pretest genetic counseling (GC) is recommended in conjunction with genetic testing (GT) for cardiovascular (CV) indications, yet access to CVGC is limited leading to delayed GT. Posttest GC could increase GC and GT access but requires efficient pretest education that supports both informed GT decision-making and robust GT uptake. Methods: We developed four indication-tailored online CV genetics education videos and deployed them in a 3-arm randomized trial comparing pretest vs. posttest outpatient CVGC (RESEQUENCE-GC, NCT05422573 ). Participants were 1:1:1 randomized to pretest video education plus an optional (efficiency arm) or required (flipped arm) phone call with a genetic counselor and planned posttest CVGC or to standard pretest CVGC (SOC arm). Questionnaires administered at baseline and post-education included the CV Multidimensional Model of Informed Choice [MMIC] to quantify GT knowledge and informed GT choice. Results: 389/767 (50.7%) adults aged 18-80 (mean 51.2±14.9 years) scheduling a first CVGC appointment consented to RESEQUENCE-GC and completed the baseline questionnaire. Efficiency arm participants (video education + optional phone call) were most likely to complete pretest education (134, 97.4% efficiency; 107, 85.6% flipped; 111, 87.4% SOC, p=0.0012) and elect GT (131, 95.6% efficiency; 105, 84.0% flipped; 107, 84.2% SOC, p=0.0036). Few (4, 2.9%) efficiency arm participants requested an optional pretest phone call. Most flipped arm participants (90, 84.1%) had no post-video questions, consistent with the 97 second [IQR: 65s-145s] median call duration. CV genetics knowledge was high post-education (median 8 [IQR 7,8]/8 MMIC items correct). Only video-based pretest education was associated with a significant increase in knowledge (p<0.0001). Nearly all participants made an informed GT choice with no difference between intervention (95.6%) and SOC (90.4%) arms (p=0.074). Conclusions: Tailored, online video pretest education can enhance CV GT uptake, support informed GT decision-making, and be integrated into efficient pretest workflows, suggesting utility in scalable posttest CVGC.

This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit: