Determinants of pancreaticoenteric anastomotic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 71 (9) , 511-515
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the present paper was to study the incidence, presentation and management of pancreaticoenteric anastomotic (PEA) leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and to identify risk factors associated with PEA leak. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients underwent PD for benign and malignant pancreatic and periampullary lesions from 1989 to 1998. Prospectively collected data were analysed for incidence and outcome of PEA leak. Four clinical, three laboratory parameters, preoperative biliary drainage (PBD), perioperative octreotide use, nine intraoperative parameters, site of tumour and stage of malignant tumours were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors influencing PEA leak. Results: Pancreatic leak developed in 15 (12.5%) patients. Nine patients (60%) had a PEA leak that manifested as controlled leak through the drain. All were managed conservatively and the leak stopped after a mean duration of 17 days (range: 6–32 days). Six (40%) patients had associated intra-abdominal complications, and three (50%) died in the postoperative period. Pancreatic fistula healed in the three remaining patients after a mean duration of 18 days (range: 15–25 days). Diabetes (P = 0.02; odds ratio (OR) = 4.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23–17.18), PBD (P = 0.03; OR = 4.82; 95% CI: 1.21–19.24), sequence of reconstruction (bilioenteric anastomosis as first anastomosis; P = 0.01; OR = 6.25; 95% CI: 1.45–26.83) and duration of surgery > 8 h (P = 0.01; OR: 5.61; 95% CI: 1.54–20.39) were associated with a significantly higher incidence of PEA leak. Conclusion: Pancreaticoenteric anastomotic leak occurred in 12% of patients undergoing PD for pancreatic and periampullary tumours. The majority of these were uncomplicated and healed with conservative treatment. Complicated leaks were associated with high mortality. Diabetes mellitus, PBD, prolonged surgery and the sequence of reconstruction were risk factors associated with an increased incidence of PEA leak.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pancreaticogastrostomy Compared with Pancreaticojejunostomy after PancreaticoduodenectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Stented Versus Nonstented Pancreaticojejunostomy After PancreatoduodenectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- Incidence, Risk Factors, and Treatment of Pancreatic Leakage After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Drainage versus Resection of the Pancreatic RemnantJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1997
- Management of the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- A Prospective Randomized Trial of Pancreaticogastrostomy Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy After PancreaticoduodenectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Pancreatoduodenectomy with occlusion of the residual stump by Neoprene® injectionWorld Journal of Surgery, 1989
- Management of periampullary carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Pyloric and Gastric Preserving Pancreatic ResectionAnnals of Surgery, 1986
- Pancreatoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreasBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Pancreatic fistula complicating pancreatectomy for malignant diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1981