Testicular Sperm Aspiration (TESA) or Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (Micro–tese): Which Approach is better in Men with Cryptozoospermia and Severe Oligozoospermia?
Authors:
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) in Extreme Cases of Male InfertilityPLOS ONE, 2014
- Testicular Sperm Aspiration for Nonazoospermic Men: Sperm Retrieval and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection OutcomesUrology, 2014
- Sperm retrieval techniquesNature Reviews Urology, 2013
- Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non‐obstructive azoospermia: a systematic reviewAndrology, 2013
- Absolute asthenozoospermia and ICSI: what are the options?Human Reproduction Update, 2011
- Virtual Azoospermia and Cryptozoospermia--Fresh/Frozen Testicular or Ejaculate Sperm for Better IVF Outcome?Journal of Andrology, 2010
- World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics*‡Human Reproduction Update, 2009
- Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extractionUrology, 2005
- Nonobstructive azoospermiaCurrent Opinion in Urology, 2000
- Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyteThe Lancet, 1992