Households' Willingness to Pay for “Green” Goods: Evidence from Patagonia's Introduction of Organic Cotton Sportswear
Authors:
- Ramon Casadesus‐MasanellRCRamon Casadesus‐Masanell
- Michael CrookeMCMichael Crooke
- Forest ReinhardtFRForest Reinhardt
- Vishal VasishthVVVishal Vasishth
- 16 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
- Vol. 18 (1) , 203-233
Abstract
To shed light on individuals' willingness to pay for “green” goods (i.e., goods that are supposed to have lower adverse environmental impacts either in production or in use), we study data from the introduction by Patagonia, Inc., of organic cotton sportswear in the mid‐1990s. Patagonia, a maker of high‐end outdoor wear, substituted organic cotton for conventionally grown cotton in all of its sportswear (i.e., casual clothing for travel and leisure) in 1996. We find that customers were willing to pay significant premiums for organic cotton garments although the organic cotton provided no demonstrable private incremental benefits to the customer.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Técnicas económicas para la estimación de la demanda de productos sostenibles: Un estudio para el café de comercio justo y orgánico en el Reino UnidoEconomía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 2011
- Impure public goods and the comparative statics of environmentally friendly consumptionJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2005
- Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences EstimatorsReview of Economic Studies, 2005
- How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Can Eco-Labels Tune a Market? Evidence from Dolphin-Safe LabelingJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002
- Are Eco‐Labels Valuable? Evidence From the Apparel IndustryAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999
- Regression Analysis of Count Data1998
- Going Organic: Converting Patagonia's Cotton Product LineJournal of Industrial Ecology, 1997