A Prospective Comparison of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT and PSMA-Targeted 18F-DCFBC PET/CT in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
- 30 March 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Society of Nuclear Medicine in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Vol. 59 (11) , 1665-1671
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFBC positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), a first generation 18F-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agent, and 18F-NaF PET/CT, a sensitive marker of osteoblastic activity, in a prospective cohort of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: Twenty-eight prostate cancer patients with metastatic disease on conventional imaging prospectively received up to four PET/CT scans. All patients completed baseline 18F-DCFBC PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT scans and 23 patients completed follow-up imaging, with median follow-up interval of 5.7 months (range 4.2-12.6 months). Lesion detection was compared across the two PET/CT agents at each timepoint. Detection and standardized uptake value (SUV) characteristics of each PET/CT agent were compared with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and treatment status at the time of baseline imaging using non-parametric statistical testing (Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon rank). Results: Twenty-six patients had metastatic disease detected on 18F-NaF or 18F-DCFBC at baseline and two patients were negative on both scans. Three patients demonstrated soft-tissue only disease. Of 241 lesions detected at baseline, 56 were soft-tissue lesions identified by 18F-DCFBC only and 185 bone lesions detected on 18F-NaF and/or 18F-DCFBC. 18F-NaF detected significantly more bone lesions compared to 18F-DCFBC (p0.5, p18F-NaF (ρ0.1). Combining PSA levels with treatment status, patients with below median levels of PSA (2ng/ml, patients on ADT (N = 8) showed equal or more lesions on 18F-DCFBC compared to 18F-NaF. Conclusion: The utility of PSMA-targeting imaging in metastatic prostate cancer appears to depend on patient disease course and treatment status. Compared to 18F-NaF PET/CT, 18F-DCFBC PET/CT detected significantly fewer bone lesions in the setting of early or metastatic castrate sensitive disease on treatment. However, in advanced metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, 18F-DCFBC PET/CT shows good concordance with 18F-NaF PET/CT.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET versus 18F-NaF PET: evaluation of response to 223Ra therapy in a prostate cancer patientEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014
- No improvement noted in overall or cause‐specific survival for men presenting with metastatic prostate cancer over a 20‐year periodCancer, 2013
- Biodistribution, Tumor Detection, and Radiation Dosimetry of 18F-DCFBC, a Low-Molecular-Weight Inhibitor of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen, in Patients with Metastatic Prostate CancerJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2012
- Noninvasive measurement of androgen receptor signaling with a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical that targets prostate-specific membrane antigenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Prospective Evaluation of 99mTc MDP Scintigraphy, 18F NaF PET/CT, and 18F FDG PET/CT for Detection of Skeletal MetastasesMolecular Imaging and Biology, 2011
- Pathogenesis of osteoblastic bone metastases from prostate cancerCancer, 2010
- N-[N-[(S)-1,3-Dicarboxypropyl]Carbamoyl]-4-[18F]Fluorobenzyl-l-Cysteine, [18F]DCFBC: A New Imaging Probe for Prostate CancerClinical Cancer Research, 2008
- The role of tumor microenvironment in prostate cancer bone metastasisJournal of Cellular Biochemistry, 2007
- Extension of the Rank Sum Test for Clustered Data: Two‐Group Comparisons with Group Membership Defined at the Subunit LevelBiometrics, 2006
- Castration‐induced changes in morphology, androgen levels, and proliferative activity of human prostate cancer tissue grown in athymic nude miceThe Prostate, 1993