Predictive Models for Kidney Offer Acceptance: Challenges and Strategies
Open Access
- 9 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Transplantation
- Vol. 2026 (1)
Abstract
Background: Predicting whether an organ offer will be accepted for transplantation remains challenging for several reasons, including large offer volumes, highly imbalanced observations (more declines than acceptances), and lack of information about the human decision‐making process. Offer acceptance models are used for risk‐adjusted program evaluations and policy development, but there is a lack of literature on baselines and best practices for predictive applications. We compared a suite of machine learning models, feature sets, and sampling procedures to identify performance impacts when training offer acceptance prediction models. Methods: We evaluated several kidney offer acceptance models from logistic regression to gradient boosted trees that were trained on donor and candidate characteristics. We then selected the best‐performing model and augmented training data with additional features (e.g., distance from the closest airport to the transplant hospital) or additional sampling procedures (e.g., undersampling). Results: Compared to the baseline logistic regression model (average precision: 0.0645), the XGBoost model offered the best performance improvement over the baseline (average precision: 0.0907). Including transportation‐related features in the model further improved model performance (average precision: 0.0940); however, we did not observe substantial model performance differences based on the sampling procedure used. Conclusions: Leveraging advanced machine learning models and incorporating nonclinical datapoints (like transportation distances) can improve transplant organ offer acceptance prediction models. However, we observed steep tradeoffs between precision and recall as captured in the low average precision scores despite deceptively high AUROCs (baseline AUROC 0.832). Our findings suggest that even the best‐performing models would not provide clear, equitable benefits over existing allocation policies. More research is needed before these models are practical for clinical implementation.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of Racial Disparities With Access to Kidney Transplant After the Implementation of the New Kidney Allocation SystemJAMA Surgery, 2019
- Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care officesnpj Digital Medicine, 2018
- Association of Race and Ethnicity With Live Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United States From 1995 to 2014JAMA, 2018
- Predictors of Deceased Donor Kidney Discard in the United StatesTransplantation, 2017
- US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2017
- Diagnosing the Decades-Long Rise in the Deceased Donor Kidney Discard Rate in the United StatesTransplantation, 2017
- Changes in Discard Rate After the Introduction of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI)American Journal of Transplantation, 2016
- Early Changes in Kidney Distribution under the New Allocation SystemJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2015
- Rates of Kidney Transplantation From Living and Deceased Donors for Blacks and Whites in the United States, 1998 to 2011JAMA Internal Medicine, 2015
- Living Donor Kidney TransplantationClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2015