Evaluation of the Distress Thermometer in Pelvic Exenteration: Responsiveness‐To‐Change, Convergent Validity, and Clinical Cutoff
Open Access
- 14 August 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Psycho-Oncology
- Vol. 35 (8) , e70565
Abstract
Background: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a radical surgery for advanced pelvic malignancies that carries substantial psychosocial impacts. Assessing distress is critical for timely support. Aims: To evaluate the responsiveness‐to‐change and convergent validity of the distress thermometer (DT), and to determine an optimal cutoff score for detecting clinically significant distress in a PE cohort. Methods: Secondary analyses of cohort study data involving adult patients who underwent PE at a quaternary referral hospital. Responsiveness was evaluated by determining whether the DT differentiated cases of decreased emotional well‐being and health‐related quality of life from pre‐ to post‐surgery, using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐General (FACT‐G), FACT‐Colorectal, and Emotional Well‐Being (EWB) subscale as external criteria. Convergent validity was evaluated using the correlation between the DT and the EWB subscale scores. Cutoff scores were examined by reviewing the following indices, using an existing EWB cutoff as an external anchor: sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, and clinical utility index (CUI). Results: The analysis included 377 patients (mean age: 61 years, 56% male; 41% recurrent rectal cancer). The DT demonstrated responsiveness, with AUCs > 0.7 for detecting emotional and quality‐of‐life decline post‐surgery. Convergent validity was demonstrated through a moderate correlation between the DT and the EWB subscale scores ( r s = −0.56, p < 0.001). The optimal DT cutoff score was 4: Sensitivity; 87.0%, Specificity; 52.7%, CUI− value; 0.49 (ruling out cases: satisfactory utility), CUI+ value; 0.33 (case finding: poor utility). Conclusion: The DT is a valid and responsive tool for detecting psychological distress in PE patients. Its high sensitivity supports its use in routine screening.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uncovering Barriers to Screening for Distress in Patients With Cancer via Machine LearningJournal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, 2022
- The use of distress thermometer in advanced cancer inpatients with painPsycho-Oncology, 2019
- Quality of life after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic cancer: Findings from a qualitative studyPsycho-Oncology, 2018
- Cohort study of long-term survival and quality of life following pelvic exenterationBJS Open, 2018
- Systematic review of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenterationEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2016
- Ambulatory cancer and US general population reference values and cutoff scores for the functional assessment of cancer therapyCancer, 2014
- Validation of the Distress Thermometer in a Swedish population of oncology patients; accuracy of changes during six monthsEuropean Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2013
- Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation studyPsycho-Oncology, 2007
- Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patientsCancer, 2005
- A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scaleJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004