Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in the modern era: Single-center outcomes with DIPSS risk stratification
Authors:
Open Access
- 3 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Blood Research
- Vol. 61 (1)
Abstract
To describe the post-transplant outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) risk at transplantation, and to identify clinical factors associated with overall survival (OS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We retrospectively analyzed the data of 42 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent allo-HSCT at Samsung Medical Center between 2014 and 2023. OS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Exploratory Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses were performed to assess independent associations with OS. At transplantation, 28 patients (66.7%) had Intermediate (Int-1/2) and 14 (33.3%) had High DIPSS risk. OS differed significantly by DIPSS risk group (log-rank P = 0.0034): the median OS was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2–NR months) in the Intermediate-risk group versus 6.4 months (95% CI, 3.3–35.1 months) in the High-risk group. All 14 patients in the High-risk group (100%) and 14 of 28 patients in the Intermediate-risk group (50%) died during follow-up. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates in the Intermediate- and High-risk groups were 57.1% vs. 28.6%, 50.0% vs. 14.3%, and 50.0% vs. 7.1%, respectively. In an exploratory multivariable analysis adjusted for hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index and donor type, DIPSS High-risk disease remained independently associated with inferior OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.91; 95% CI, 1.27–6.63; P = 0.011). No other clinical variable, including age (≥ 60 vs. < 60 years; P = 0.16 by log-rank), achieved statistical significance. DIPSS High-risk disease at transplantation was associated with uniformly poor post-transplant survival in this single-center cohort. These hypothesis-generating findings underscore the importance of transplant timing before progression to high-risk disease, and warrant validation in larger multicenter studies. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44313-026-00142-5.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic and Predictive Models in MyelofibrosisCurrent Hematologic Malignancy Reports, 2024
- Myelofibrosis: Current unmet needs, emerging treatments, and future perspectivesCancer, 2024
- Splenic irradiation for myelofibrosis prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation: A global collaborative analysisAmerican Journal of Hematology, 2024
- Splenomegaly in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who are candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a Position Paper on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMTThe Lancet Haematology, 2022
- Impact of spleen size and splenectomy on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: A retrospective analysis by the chronic malignancies working party on behalf of European society for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT)American Journal of Hematology, 2020
- Concomitant and noncanonical JAK2 and MPL mutations in JAK2V617F‐ and MPLW515 L‐positive myelofibrosisGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 2019
- Splenic irradiation before allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosisMedical Oncology, 2019
- Pacritinib vs Best Available Therapy, Including Ruxolitinib, in Patients With MyelofibrosisJAMA Oncology, 2018
- Allogeneic transplantation for myelofibrosis with adverse risk karyotype: Attack on the clones?American Journal of Hematology, 2018
- Safety and Efficacy of Fedratinib in Patients With Primary or Secondary MyelofibrosisJAMA Oncology, 2015