Baseline Staging Imaging for Distant Metastasis in Women with Stages I, II, and III Breast Cancer
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Oncology
- Vol. 27 (2) , 123-145
Abstract
Background: In Ontario, there is no clearly defined standard of care for staging for distant metastasis in women with newly diagnosed and biopsy-confirmed breast cancer whose clinical presentation is suggestive of early-stage disease. This guideline addresses baseline imaging investigations for women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who are otherwise asymptomatic for distant metastasis. Methods: The medline and embase databases were systematically searched for evidence from January 2000 to April 2019, and the best available evidence was used to draft recommendations relevant to the use of baseline imaging investigation in women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who are otherwise asymptomatic. Final approval of this practice guideline was obtained from both the Staging in Early Stage Breast Cancer Advisory Committee and the Report Approval Panel of the Program in Evidence-Based Care. Recommendations: These recommendations apply to all women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer (originating in the breast) who have no symptoms of distant metastasis Staging tests using conventional anatomic imaging [chest radiography, liver ultrasonography, chest–abdomen–pelvis computed tomography (ct)] or metabolic imaging modalities [integrated positron-emission tomography (pet)/ct, integrated pet/magnetic resonance imaging (mri), bone scintigraphy] should not be routinely ordered for women newly diagnosed with clinical stage i or stage ii breast cancer who have no symptoms of distant metastasis, regardless of biomarker status. In women newly diagnosed with stage iii breast cancer, baseline staging tests using either anatomic imaging (chest radiography, liver ultrasonography, chest–abdomen–pelvis ct) or metabolic imaging modalities (pet/ct, pet/mri, bone scintigraphy) should be considered regardless of whether the patient is symptomatic for distant metastasis and regardless of biomarker profile.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging locally advanced breast cancerIndian Journal of Medical Research, 2018
- Rate of Distant Metastases on 18F-FDG PET/CT at Initial Staging of Breast Cancer: Comparison of Women Younger and Older Than 40 YearsJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2016
- Prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging and of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancerEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014
- Retrospective Analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Staging Asymptomatic Breast Cancer Patients Younger Than 40 YearsJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2014
- The impact of PET/CT imaging performed in the early postoperative period on the management of breast cancer patientsNuclear Medicine Communications, 2013
- 18F-FDG PET/CT in Staging Patients with Locally Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Comparison to Conventional StagingJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2012
- Prospective Study of 2-[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Assessment of Regional Nodal Spread of Disease in Patients With Breast Cancer: An Ontario Clinical Oncology Group StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in clinical staging of asymptomatic breast cancer patients to detect asymptomatic distant metastasesOncology Letters, 2012
- The Yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Clinical Stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA Breast Cancer: A Prospective StudyJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2011
- Baseline staging tests in primary breast cancer: a practice guideline.2001