A prospective cohort study investigating the effect of generalized joint hypermobility on outcomes after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization
- 1 October 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Physician and Sportsmedicine
- Vol. 44 (4) , 380-384
Abstract
Objectives: Generalized joint laxity has been proposed as a significant risk factor for failure after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization. The purpose of this study was to prospectively measure joint mobility in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization and to determine whether hypermobility is a risk factor for worse outcomes compared with patients having normal joint mobility. Methods: Patients with anterior shoulder instability were prospectively enrolled. Generalized joint hypermobility was measured using the Beighton Hypermobility Score and the Rowe, UCLA, SANE, SST, and WOSI scores were administered and reported as patient outcomes preoperatively and following arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their Beighton Hypermobility Score, with scores ≥ 4/9 indicative of joint hypermobility. Results: Sixteen patients with joint hypermobility (JH) and 18 non-hypermobile patients (NJH) were enrolled. At baseline, there were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or baseline patient-reported outcomes. Significantly more patients in the NJH group had SLAP tears (n = 10) compared to the JH group (n = 2) (p = .013). At all follow-up times, there were no significant differences between the NJH and JH groups with regard to patient-reported outcome scores (p > .05). In the JH group, 17% of patients reported recurrent instability at two years postoperatively compared to 25% of patients in the NJH group. There was no significant difference in failure rate (p = .67). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes or recurrent instability in patients with versus without joint hypermobility undergoing arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long‐Term Outcomes After Bankart Shoulder StabilizationArthroscopy, 2013
- Surgical Trends in Bankart RepairThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011
- Long term results of arthroscopic bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instabilityJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2011
- Arthroscopic versus Open Shoulder Stabilization for Recurrent Anterior InstabilityThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2006
- Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Meta‐analysisArthroscopy, 2005
- Open Bankart Repair versus Arthroscopic Repair with Transglenoid Sutures or Bioabsorbable Tacks for Recurrent Anterior Instability of the ShoulderThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004
- Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: A prospective randomized studyArthroscopy, 2004
- ARTHROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN BANKART REPAIR FOR TRAUMATIC ANTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITYClinics in Sports Medicine, 2000
- Long-Term Followup of Bankart ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1995
- The pathology and treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder-jointBritish Journal of Surgery, 1938