Writing to template: Researchers’ negotiation of procedural research ethics
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 255, 112980
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J500094/1)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a ConceptScience, Technology, & Human Values, 2010
- Ethics and the ethnography of medical research in AfricaSocial Science & Medicine, 2008
- Informed consent in a changing environmentSocial Science & Medicine, 2007
- Written work: The social functions of Research Ethics Committee lettersSocial Science & Medicine, 2007
- Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in ResearchQualitative Inquiry, 2004
- What Makes Clinical Research in Developing Countries Ethical? The Benchmarks of Ethical ResearchThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Four Approaches to Doing EthicsThe Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 1996
- Standardization across Non-standard Domains: The Case of Organ ProcurementScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1995
- Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39Social Studies of Science, 1989
- On Multiple RealitiesPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1945