Efficacy of oral powder compared with chewable tablets for lanthanum carbonate administration in hemodialysis patients
- 17 October 2013
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Hemodialysis International
- Vol. 17 (S1) , S2-S6
Abstract
Lanthanum carbonate (LC) has been administered in a chewable tablet form for patients with hyperphosphatemia undergoing dialysis. However, some patients have difficulty chewing the tablets. LC oral powder has recently been released in Japan. The purpose of this study was to clarify the efficacy of LC oral powder form compared with that of chewable tablet form. The efficacy and safety of LC oral powder was retrospectively assessed in hemodialysis patients who switched from chewable tablet form to oral powder form without dose modification. Thirty‐six patients (mean age, 66.8 ± 10.5 years; male, 64%; 39% with diabetes; mean duration of dialysis treatment, 99.2 ± 95.6 months) were enrolled in this study between June and July of 2012. Changes in clinical data and adverse events after the switch to oral powder form were investigated. The average dose of LC was 1180 ± 520 mg/day. Serum phosphorus levels were significantly decreased after the switch from chewable tablet form to oral powder form (5.3 ± 1.7 mg/dL at baseline vs. 4.9 ± 1.2 mg/dL at after 1 month after, P = 0.038). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels. Furthermore, no significant differences were evident in weight gain after the switch to oral powder form (2.5 ± 1.2 kg at baseline vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 kg at 1 month after the switch, P = 0.29). No serious adverse events were recorded. Our results suggest that LC is more effective in oral powder form than chewable tablet form for hemodialysis patients.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Evaluation of the In Vitro Efficacy of Lanthanum Carbonate Chewable TabletsJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2013
- Phosphate‐binding efficacy of crushed vs. chewed lanthanum carbonate in hemodialysis patientsHemodialysis International, 2010
- Benefits and Harms of Phosphate Binders in CKD: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled TrialsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2009
- Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Dialysis PatientsTherapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 2008
- Overview of Regular Dialysis Treatment in Japan as of 31 December 2006Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 2008
- Multicenter prospective randomized, double-blind comparative study between lanthanum carbonate and calcium carbonate as phosphate binders in Japanese hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemiaClinical Nephrology, 2008
- Effects of Serum Calcium, Phosphorous, and Intact Parathyroid Hormone Levels on Survival in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients in JapanTherapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 2008
- Definition, evaluation, and classification of renal osteodystrophy: A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)Kidney International, 2006
- Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Undergo Vesicle-Mediated Calcification in Response to Changes in Extracellular Calcium and Phosphate ConcentrationsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2004
- Mineral Metabolism, Mortality, and Morbidity in Maintenance HemodialysisJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2004