Actuarial Fairness of Crop Insurance Rates with Constant Rate Relativities
Authors:
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Vol. 86 (3) , 563-575
Abstract
Increased availability and demand for low‐deductible crop insurance policies have increased focus on crop insurance rating methods. Actuarial fairness cannot be achieved if constant multiplicative factors are used to determine how premiums change as coverage levels increase. A comparison of premium rates generated by the factors used by the two most popular crop insurance products with those generated by a standard yield distribution shows that the popular insurance products overcharge for low‐deductible policies in most counties. This overpricing may explain why large premium subsidies were required to induce farmers to move from low‐deductible to high‐deductible policies beginning in 2001.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling Conditional Yield DensitiesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003
- Nonparametric Estimation of Crop Insurance Rates RevisitedAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2000
- Are Crop Yields Normally Distributed?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999
- Nonparametric Estimation of Crop Yield Distributions: Implications for Rating Group‐Risk Crop Insurance ContractsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998
- Input Demand under Yield and Revenue InsuranceAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1996
- Modeling Farm‐Level Crop Insurance Demand with Panel DataAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1996
- Marketing Quotas and Random Yields: Marginal Effects of Inframarginal Subsidies on Peanut SupplyAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1994
- Probability Distributions of Field Crop YieldsJournal of Farm Economics, 1965