Frailty Status and Preoperative Cardiac Risk Stratification in Older Adults Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
Authors:
- Athanasia ChatziperiACAthanasia Chatziperi
- Calvin DiepCalvin Diep
- Julian F. DazaJDJulian F. Daza
- Leandra A. AmadoLALeandra A. Amado
- Juan F. MoralesJMJuan F. Morales
- Emmanuelle DuceppeEmmanuelle Duceppe
- Angela JerathAngela Jerath
- Sinziana AvramescuSinziana Avramescu
- Sakshi GandotraSakshi Gandotra
- Manoj M. LaluManoj M. Lalu
- Stuart A. McCluskeyStuart A. McCluskey
- Daniel I. McIsaacDaniel I. McIsaac
- 16 June 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Heart Association
- Vol. 15 (12) , e049360
Abstract
Background: Frailty is prevalent among older adults and associated with increased postoperative morbidity and death. Guidelines recommend consideration of frailty to inform preoperative cardiac risk stratification. However, its incremental prognostic value beyond established tools including clinical indices, functional capacity, and biomarkers is uncertain. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study involving older adults (aged ≥65 years) undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale. The primary outcome was 30‐day major adverse cardiac events, defined as myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4) and major adverse cardiac events, adjusting for age, sex, Revised Cardiac Risk Index, Duke Activity Status Index, and natriuretic peptide concentration. Incremental prognostic value was assessed using the likelihood ratio test, concordance index, fraction of new predictive information, and decision curves. Results: Among 1939 participants (median age, 72 years; 42% women), 43% had frailty, and 4.9% experienced 30‐day major adverse cardiac events. The Duke Activity Status Index and the Clinical Frailty Scale were strongly correlated ( R =−0.64). Frailty was associated with major adverse cardiac events after adjustment for age, sex, and Revised Cardiac Risk Index (odds ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.05–2.51]) but not after further adjustment for Duke Activity Status Index or natriuretic peptide concentrations. Frailty improved prediction beyond clinical factors alone but not when functional capacity or biomarkers were included. Conclusions: Frailty was associated with increased cardiac risk and improved prediction beyond clinical factors, but its incremental prognostic value diminished when functional capacity or biomarkers were available, supporting its selective use when these measures are unavailable.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Versus Frailty, Measured by the Clinical Frailty Score, in Predicting Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer SurgeryWorld Journal of Surgery, 2020
- Integration of the Duke Activity Status Index into preoperative risk evaluation: a multicentre prospective cohort studyBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2020
- Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: infection and sepsisBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2019
- Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery researchBritish Journal of Surgery, 2019
- A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complicationsBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2018
- Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction ModelsJAMA, 2017
- CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care–associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care settingAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2008
- The I.A.N.A. task force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practiceThe Journal of nutrition, health and aging, 2008
- Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyondStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1989