Highly favorable physiological responses to concurrent resistance and high-intensity interval training during chemotherapy: the OptiTrain breast cancer trial
Open Access
- 18 January 2018
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 169 (1) , 93-103
Abstract
Background Advanced therapeutic strategies are often accompanied by significant adverse effects, which warrant equally progressive countermeasures. Physical exercise has proven an effective intervention to improve physical function and reduce fatigue in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in this population are not well established although HIIT has proven effective in other clinical populations. The aim of the OptiTrain trial was to examine the effects of concurrent resistance and high-intensity interval training (RT-HIIT) or concurrent moderate-intensity aerobic and high-intensity interval training (AT-HIIT), to usual care (UC) on pain sensitivity and physiological outcomes in patients with breast cancer during chemotherapy. Methods Two hundred and forty women were randomized to 16 weeks of RT-HIIT, AT-HIIT, or UC. Outcomes: cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, body mass, hemoglobin levels, and pressure-pain threshold. Results Pre- to post-intervention, RT-HIIT (ES = 0.41) and AT-HIIT (ES = 0.42) prevented the reduced cardiorespiratory fitness found with UC. Handgrip strength (surgery side: RT-HIIT vs. UC: ES = 0.41, RT-HIIT vs. AT-HIIT: ES = 0.28; non-surgery side: RT-HIIT vs. UC: ES = 0.35, RT-HIIT vs. AT-HIIT: ES = 0.22) and lower-limb muscle strength (RT-HIIT vs. UC: ES = 0.66, RT-HIIT vs. AT-HIIT: ES = 0.23) were significantly improved in the RT-HIIT. Increases in body mass were smaller in RT-HIIT (ES = − 0.16) and AT-HIIT (ES = − 0.16) versus UC. RT-HIIT reported higher pressure-pain thresholds than UC (trapezius: ES = 0.46, gluteus: ES = 0.53) and AT-HIIT (trapezius: ES = 0.30). Conclusion Sixteen weeks of RT-HIIT significantly improved muscle strength and reduced pain sensitivity. Both exercise programs were well tolerated and were equally efficient in preventing increases in body mass and in preventing declines in cardiorespiratory fitness. These results highlight the importance of implementing a combination of resistance and high-intensity interval training during chemotherapy for women with breast cancer.Keywords
Funding Information
- Cancerfonden (130452)
- Cancerföreningen i Stockholm (131242)
- Svenska Läkaresällskapet (SLS 50514)
- Svenska Cancer och Trafikskadades Riksförbund (F-C-001225)
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Principled missing data methods for researchersSpringerPlus, 2013
- A Meta-Analytic Review of the Hypoalgesic Effects of ExerciseThe Journal of Pain, 2012
- Lack of Muscle Contractile Property Changes at the Time of Perceived Physical Exhaustion Suggests Central Mechanisms Contributing to Early Motor Task Failure in Patients With Cancer-Related FatigueJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2012
- The Handgrip Strength Test as a Measure of Function in Breast Cancer SurvivorsAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2012
- The Effect of Anxiety on Breast Cancer PatientsIndian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 2012
- Responsiveness of EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR38 and FACT-C quality of life questionnaires in patients with colorectal cancerHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2011
- Cancer-Related Fatigue: Central or Peripheral?Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2009
- Moderators of the effects of exercise training in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapyCancer, 2008
- Self‐reported pain sensitivity: Lack of correlation with pain threshold and toleranceEuropean journal of pain, 2007
- Effectiveness of Physical Activity on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Health-Related Quality of Life in Young and Middle-Aged Cancer Patients Shortly After ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005