Identification of the Optimal Donor Quality Scoring System and Measure of Early Renal Function in Kidney Transplantation
Authors:
- Satish RamakrishnaSRSatish Ramakrishna
- Kay TanKTKay Tan
- Paul CockwellPCPaul Cockwell
- Kevin EardleyKEKevin Eardley
- Mark A. LittleMLMark A. Little
- Paul RylancePRPaul Rylance
- Kunigal ShivakumarKSKunigal Shivakumar
- Vijayan SureshVSVijayan Suresh
- Kerry TomlinsonKTKerry Tomlinson
- Andrew ReadyARAndrew Ready
- Richard BorrowsRBRichard Borrows
- 27 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 87 (4) , 578-586
Abstract
The early identification of kidney allografts at risk of later dysfunction has implications for clinical practice. Donor quality scoring systems (preoperative) and measures of early allograft function (first week postoperative) have previously shown practical utility. This study aimed to determine the optimal parameter(s) (preoperative and postoperative) with greatest predictive power for the development of subsequent allograft dysfunction. Consecutive deceased donor renal transplants (n=217) were studied. In each, the following measures were assessed: Preoperative donor quality scores: expanded criteria donor status; Deceased Donor Score (Nyberg et al., Am J Transplant 2003;3:715); Donor Risk Score (Schold et al., Am J Transplant 2005; 5(4 pt 1): 757); and delayed graft function (DGF) Nomogram (Irish et al., J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2967). Postoperative early function measures: dialysis requirement and duration; extended DGF definition (Boom et al., Kidney Int 2000; 58: 859); creatinine at day 5 and day 7; creatinine reduction ratios at day 2 and day 7; and urine output posttransplantation. Primary outcome measures were creatinine at 12 months and the development of chronic kidney disease stage 4T. Of donor scoring systems, Donor Risk Score was best associated with subsequent allograft function. Of early function measures: the extended definition of DGF, creatinine at day 5, and dialysis duration showed greatest predictive power in the patient population overall, those not requiring postoperative dialysis, and those requiring dialysis, respectively. No scores or early function measures were associated with change in creatinine between 6 and 12 months. This study validates and identifies the optimal early predictive parameter available for kidney transplant recipients, with implications for refining early postoperative management and potential utility in organ allocation policy.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Major effects of delayed graft function and cold ischaemia time on renal allograft survivalNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2006
- The Broad Spectrum of Quality in Deceased Donor KidneysAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2005
- Surrogate Markers for Long-Term Renal Allograft SurvivalAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2004
- The Natural History of Chronic Allograft NephropathyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Nomogram for Predicting the Likelihood of Delayed Graft Function in Adult Cadaveric Renal Transplant RecipientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2003
- Improved Scoring System to Assess Adult Donors For Cadaver Renal TransplantationAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2003
- Donor age and delayed graft function as predictors of renal allograft survival in rejection-free patientsNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1999
- DELETERIOUS EFFECTS OF DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION IN CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS INDEPENDENT OF ACUTE REJECTION1,2,3Transplantation, 1998
- DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION: RISK FACTORS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RENAL ALLOGRAFT SURVIVAL1Transplantation, 1997
- Delayed function reduces renal allograft survival independent of acute rejectionNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1996