Pandora Box Problem with Nonobligatory Inspection: Hardness and Approximation Scheme
Preprint
Abstract
Weitzman (1979) introduced the Pandora Box problem as a model for sequential search with inspection costs, and gave an elegant index-based policy that attains provably optimal expected payoff. In various scenarios, the searching agent may select an option without making a costly inspection. The variant of the Pandora box problem with non-obligatory inspection has attracted interest from both economics and algorithms researchers. Various simple algorithms have proved suboptimal, with the best known 0.8-approximation algorithm due to Guha et al. (2008). No hardness result for the problem was known. In this work, we show that it is NP-hard to compute an optimal policy for Pandora's problem with nonobligatory inspection. We also give a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) that computes policies with an expected payoff at least $(1 - \epsilon)$-fraction of the optimal, for arbitrarily small $\epsilon > 0$. On the side, we show the decision version of the problem to be in NP.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pandora's Problem with Nonobligatory Inspection2019
- Ordered Consumer SearchJournal of the European Economic Association, 2017
- Bandit Processes and Dynamic Allocation IndicesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1979