Low-Cost Light-Based GelMA 3D Bioprinting via Retrofitting: Manufacturability Test and Cell Culture Assessment
Authors:
- Juan Enrique Pérez-CortezJPJuan Enrique Pérez-Cortez
- Víctor Hugo Sánchez-RodríguezVSVíctor Hugo Sánchez-Rodríguez
- Salvador Gallegos-MartínezSGSalvador Gallegos-Martínez
- Cristina Chuck-HernándezCristina Chuck-Hernández
- Ciro A. RodriguezCRCiro A. Rodriguez
- Mario Moises ÁlvarezMario Moises Álvarez
- Grissel Trujillo-De SantiagoGSGrissel Trujillo-De Santiago
- Elisa Vázquez-LepeEVElisa Vázquez-Lepe
- J. Israel Martínez-LópezJ. Israel Martínez-López
Open Access
- 25 December 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Micromachines
- Vol. 14 (1) , 55
Abstract
Light-based bioprinter manufacturing technology is still prohibitively expensive for organizations that rely on accessing three-dimensional biological constructs for research and tissue engineering endeavors. Currently, most of the bioprinting systems are based on commercial-grade-based systems or modified DIY (do it yourself) extrusion apparatuses. However, to date, few examples of the adoption of low-cost equipment have been found for light-based bioprinters. The requirement of large volumes of bioinks, their associated cost, and the lack of information regarding the parameter selection have undermined the adoption of this technology. This paper showcases the retrofitting and assessing of a low-cost Light-Based 3D printing system for tissue engineering. To evaluate the potential of a proposed design, a manufacturability test for different features, machine parameters, and Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) concentrations for 7.5% and 10% was performed. Furthermore, a case study of a previously seeded hydrogel with C2C12 cells was successfully implemented as a proof of concept. On the manufacturability test, deviational errors were found between 0.7% to 13.3% for layer exposure times of 15 and 20 s. Live/Dead and Actin-Dapi fluorescence assays after 5 days of culture showed promising results in the cell viability, elongation, and alignment of 3D bioprinted structures. The retrofitting of low-cost equipment has the potential to enable researchers to create high-resolution structures and three-dimensional in vitro models.Keywords
Funding Information
- Tecnologico de Monterrey
- Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT)
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Design and Fabrication of Human Skin by Three-Dimensional BioprintingTissue Engineering Part C: Methods, 2014
- Do-it-yourself biology: challenges and promises for an open science and technology movementSystems and Synthetic Biology, 2013
- Complex heterogeneous tissue constructs containing multiple cell types prepared by inkjet printing technologyBiomaterials, 2013
- Bioprinted Amniotic Fluid-Derived Stem Cells Accelerate Healing of Large Skin WoundsStem Cells Translational Medicine, 2012
- Scaffold‐free inkjet printing of three‐dimensional zigzag cellular tubesBiotechnology and Bioengineering, 2012
- Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysisNature Methods, 2012
- Multi-material stereolithographyJournal of Materials Processing Technology, 2011
- “One Cell−One Well”: A New Approach to Inkjet Printing Single Cell MicroarraysACS Combinatorial Science, 2010
- The dynamics of the piezo inkjet printhead operation☆Physics Reports, 2010
- High-Throughput Production of Single-Cell Microparticles Using an Inkjet Printing TechnologyJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2008