Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children
Authors:
- 20 August 2013
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Genetics
- Vol. 85 (2) , 120-126
Abstract
Exome sequencing is being offered for children with undiagnosed conditions to identify a primary (causative) variant. Parental preferences for learning secondary (incidental) variants are largely unexplored. Our objective was to characterize values and beliefs that shape parents' preferences for learning their children's sequencing results. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 25 parents of 13 minor probands with a variety of rare genetic conditions. Parents were asked to discuss their preferences to receive four types of results from exome sequencing. Many parents preferred to receive all types of results. Parents had the most positive attitudes toward learning about variants that predispose to disorders treatable or preventable in childhood. They had reservations about learning about predispositions for untreatable adult‐onset conditions and carrier status for recessive conditions. Parents described their success in coping with their child's condition as evidence for an ability to manage any additional negative health information. They felt responsible for learning about secondary variants, desiring a gain in control over their child's health. Our findings suggest that investigators should incorporate parents' perceptions of the value in receiving secondary variant information about their children when designing studies employing exome sequencing.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Drivers and barriers to patient participation in RCTsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2013
- Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq studyEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2012
- Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: Quantifying an emerging ethical responsibilityGenome Research, 2011
- Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Genetic Research and Implications for Genotype-Driven Research RecruitmentJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2011
- You Never Call, You Never Write: Why Return of ‘omic‘ Results to Research Participants is Both a Good Idea and a Moral ImperativePersonalized Medicine, 2011
- Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policyHuman Mutation, 2011
- Parent Opinions Regarding the Genetic Testing of Minors for BRCA1/2Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participantsEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2010
- Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and RecommendationsJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2008
- The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectivesEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2006