Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction
Authors:
Open Access
- 10 April 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Scientifica
- Vol. 2016, 1-9
Abstract
It is very difficult to diagnose and treat Class III malocclusion. This type of malocclusion involves a number of cranial base and maxillary and mandibular skeletal and dental compensation components. In Class III malocclusion originating from mandibular prognathism, orthodontic treatment in growing patients is not a good choice and in most cases orthognathic surgery is recommended after the end of growth. Approximately 30–40% of Class III patients exhibit some degree of maxillary deficiency; therefore, devices can be used for maxillary protraction for orthodontic treatment in early mixed dentition. In cases in which dental components are primarily responsible for Class III malocclusion, early therapeutic intervention is recommended. An electronic search was conducted using the Medline database (Entrez PubMed), the Cochrane Collaboration Oral Health Group Database of Clinical Trials, Science Direct, and Scopus. In this review article, we described the treatment options for Class III malocclusion in growing patient with an emphasis on maxillary protraction. It seems that the most important factor for treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patient is case selection.Keywords
This publication has 89 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bone anchor systems for orthodontic application: a systematic reviewInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012
- Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary tractionAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2012
- A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class III malocclusionThe Angle Orthodontist, 2012
- Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protractionAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2011
- Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patientsEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 2010
- Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: A controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patientsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010
- Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansionThe Angle Orthodontist, 2010
- Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplatesAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010
- Orthopedic Traction of the Maxilla With Miniplates: A New Perspective for Treatment of Midface DeficiencyJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2009
- A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodonticsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1995