Long‐term late toxicities and quality of life for survivors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy versus non–intensity‐modulated radiotherapy
- 18 July 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Head & Neck
- Vol. 38 (S1) , E1026-32
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate late toxicities and quality of life (QOL) of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with long‐term survival after treatment by intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus non‐IMRT.Methods: An observational, cross‐sectional study of QOL and late toxicities was conducted in 242 patients with NPC with survival of >5 years after treatment with IMRT (n = 100) or non‐IMRT (n = 142) by using physician‐assessed toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 4) and the patient‐reported European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire‐Core 30‐questions (EORTC QLQ‐C30) and the Head and Neck 35‐questions (EORTC QLQ‐C30‐H&N35) module.Results: The IMRT group had both statistically (p < .05) and clinically (difference of predicted mean scores ≥10 points) better outcome in global QOL, cognitive functioning, social functioning, fatigue, and 11 scales of the head and neck module. Late toxicities, including neuropathy, hearing loss, dysphagia, xerostomia, and neck fibrosis were significantly less severe in the IMRT group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the radiotherapy (RT) technique was statistically significantly associated with late toxicities and QOL outcome after adjusting for other clinical and demographic variables.Conclusion: The use of the IMRT technique was associated with the improvement of physician‐assessed late toxicities and patient‐reported QOL in NPC survivors. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1026–E1032, 2016Keywords
Funding Information
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (CMRPG8A0201, CMRPG8A0202, CMRPG8C1141)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinomaRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2012
- How Does Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy Influence the Treatment Results in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients?International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2011
- Major Late Toxicities After Conformal Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma—Patient- and Treatment-Related Risk FactorsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2009
- Impact of Late Treatment-Related Toxicity on Quality of Life Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With RadiotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Factors Associated With Severe Late Toxicity After Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: An RTOG AnalysisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Intensity‐modulated or conformal radiotherapy improves the quality of life of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinomaCancer, 2007
- Parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Preserved parotid function after IMRT on quantitative salivary scintigraphy, and comparison with historical data after conventional radiotherapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2006
- Preservation of quality of life after intensity‐modulated radiotherapy for early‐stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results of a prospective longitudinal studyHead & Neck, 2006
- Intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: evidence for preserved salivary gland functionRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2005
- Radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma—transition from two-dimensional to three-dimensional methodsRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2004