Feasibility and efficacy of a multi-factorial intervention to prevent falls in older adults with cognitive impairment living in residential care (ProF-Cog). A feasibility and pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
Open Access
- 30 May 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Geriatrics
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-14
Abstract
Falls are common in people with dementia living in residential care. The ProF-Cog intervention was developed to address fall risk factors specific to this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and feasibility of the intervention and provide an estimate of its efficacy. This was a cluster randomised controlled pilot study undertaken in care homes in London, UK. All permanent residents living in participating homes who were not terminally ill were invited to participate. The intervention included an assessment of falls risk factors followed by a tailored intervention which could include dementia care mapping, comprehensive geriatric assessment, occupational therapy input and twice-weekly exercise for 6 months as required to target identified risk factors. The control group received usual care without a falls risk assessment. Standing balance was the primary outcome. This and other outcome measures were collected at baseline and after 6 months. Falls were recorded for this period using incident reports. Changes were analysed using multi-level modelling. Adherence to the interventions, adverse events and trial feasibility were recorded. Nine care homes enrolled in the study with a total 191 participants (51% of those eligible); five homes allocated to the intervention with 103 participants, and four homes to the usual care control group with 88 participants. The intervention was safe with only one reported fall whilst undertaking exercise. Adherence to agreed recommendations on activity and the environment was modest (21 and 45% respectively) and to exercise was poor (41%). Balance scores (score range 0–49) analysed on 100 participants decreased by a mean of 3.9 in the control and 5.1 in the intervention groups, a non-significant difference (p = 0.9). In other measures, both groups declined equally and there was no difference in falls rates (IRR = 1.59 95%, CI 0.67–3.76). The intervention was safe but not clinically effective. Poor adherence suggests it was not an acceptable or feasible intervention. ISRCTN00695885 . Registered 26th March 2013.Keywords
Funding Information
- Health and Social Care Delivery Research Programme (PB-PG-0211-24140)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities and hospitalsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012
- Identification of high risk fallers among older people living in residential care facilities: A simple screen based on easily collectable measuresArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2012
- Estimating the prevalence of dementia: cognitive screening in Glasgow nursing homesInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2011
- Culture, consent, costs and care homes: Enabling older people with dementia to participate in researchAging & Mental Health, 2011
- Development and Initial Validation of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy ScaleThe Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2011
- Effective Exercise for the Prevention of Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2008
- The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE‐R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screeningInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2006
- Clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly people living in care homes—randomised controlled trialAge and Ageing, 2006
- EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol GroupAnnals of Medicine, 2001
- The Neuropsychiatric InventoryNeurology, 1994