Interim analysis of companion, prospective, phase II, clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of multi-modal total eradication therapy in men with synchronous oligometastatic prostate cancer
Authors:
- Diane K. ReyesDRDiane K. Reyes
- Bruce J. TrockBTBruce J. Trock
- Phuoc T. TranPTPhuoc T. Tran
- Christian P. PavlovichCPChristian P. Pavlovich
- Curtiland DevilleCDCurtiland Deville
- Mohamad E. AllafMAMohamad E. Allaf
- Stephen C. GrecoSGStephen C. Greco
- Daniel Y. SongDSDaniel Y. Song
- Trinity J. BivalacquaTBTrinity J. Bivalacqua
- Misop HanMHMisop Han
- Alan W. PartinAPAlan W. Partin
- A. Oliver SartorASA. Oliver Sartor
- 28 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Medical Oncology
- Vol. 39 (6) , 1-10
Abstract
Multimodal therapies were combined to eradicate the primary site, metastatic, and micrometastatic disease in men with newly diagnosed, synchronous, oligometastatic prostate cancer. The investigation included companion, phase II studies: total eradication therapy-1 (TET-1) for those treatment-naïve and total eradication therapy-2 (TET-2) for those post-prostatectomy. The treatment-naive protocol included androgen deprivation and docetaxel (with concurrent abiraterone added in a protocol amendment), followed by a prostatectomy, adjuvant radiation (if positive margins, T3/4, or detectable PSA), and metastasis-directed therapy. The post-prostatectomy protocol assigned the same therapies (omitting the prostatectomy). The primary endpoint was an undetectable PSA with recovered testosterone. The safety boundaries were ≤ 50% for grade 3/4 neutropenic and ≤ 20% for grade 3/4 surgical- and radiation-related toxicities. Enrollment was planned for 60 patients per protocol, to detect a PSA progression-free survival ≥ 32%, as compared to 15% in a historic control. Enrollment closed early. An interim analysis was conducted once > 50% of patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The primary endpoint duration was assessed by median progression-free survival. 52 patients were enrolled (n = 26 per protocol). Medium follow-up was 30.3 months. 80% (24/30) of evaluable patients achieved the primary endpoint; the duration was not reached. Of those not evaluable, 77% (17/22) had not reached the endpoint and 23% (5/22) had exited. There were 8% (4/52) grade 3/4 neutropenic and 2% (1/48) grade 3/4 surgical or radiation-induced toxicities. Interim findings suggest the trials’ endpoints were met, advancing the concept of total eradication therapy in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metastasis-directed Therapy of Regional and Distant Recurrences After Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureEuropean Urology, 2015
- Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Survival of Patients With Node-Positive Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2014
- Sample size calculation for the one-sample log-rank testPharmaceutical Statistics, 2014
- Adjuvant Radiotherapy Versus Wait-and-See After Radical Prostatectomy: 10-year Follow-up of the ARO 96–02/AUO AP 09/95 TrialEuropean Urology, 2014
- Prostate cancer progression after androgen deprivation therapy: mechanisms of castrate resistance and novel therapeutic approachesOncogene, 2013
- Androgen-deprivation therapy alone or with docetaxel in non-castrate metastatic prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 15): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2013
- Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911)The Lancet, 2012
- Self-Seeding in Cancer2012
- Survival Benefit of Radical Prostatectomy in Lymph Node–Positive Patients with Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2010
- Stage D1 (T1-3, N1-3, M0) Prostate cancer: a case-controlled comparison of conservative treatment versus radical prostatectomyUrology, 1997