Chasing the objective upper eyelid symmetry formula; R2, RMSE, POC, MAE and MSE
Preprint
- 29 September 2023
- preprint
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Abstract
Purpose Investigate the most appropriate mathematical formula to objectively express upper eyelid contour symmetry. Methods 62 eyes of 31 patients were included in the study. Upper eyelid contour symmetry of the patients was classified subjectively (independent of MRD1) as poor, acceptable, and good by three oculoplastic specialists (senior, expert, and junior surgeon). Bézier curves of the upper lid contour were drawn with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA). Using the algorithms created by Author SKC in Spyder (Python 3.7.9.), the symmetry of the Bézier curves of the left eyelids were obtained according to the y-axis, and the mid-pupils of both eyes are superimposed. The lower curve moved vertically to the equal height of the other curve (to equalize MRD1’s. R2 (Coefficient of determination), RMSE (Root-mean-square error), MSE (Mean squared error), POC (Percentage of co-efficiency), and MAE (Mean absolute error) were calculated. We evaluated the correlation between these objective formulas and subjective grading of three surgoens using the Spearman’s rho (ρ). Results The correlation coefficient of RMSE and MSE were the same for all surgeons grading. There was a strong correlation between the senior surgeon’s subjective scoring (N; poor = 8, acceptable = 16, good = 8) and R2, RMSE, POC, MAE (ρ = 0.643, p < 0.001, ρ =-0.607, p < 0.001, ρ = 0.562, p < 0.001, ρ =-0.517, p < 0.001, respectively). We found a strong relationship between the expert surgeon’s subjective scoring (N; poor = 9, acceptable = 13, good:10) and R2 (ρ = 0.611, p < 0.001), RMSE (ρ=-0.549, p < 0.001), POC (ρ = 0.511, p < 0.001), and MAE (ρ =-0.450, p < 0.05). We found a strong correlation between junior surgeon’s subjective scoring (N; poor = 6, acceptable = 18, good = 8) and R2, RMSE, and POC (ρ:-0.517, p < 0.001; ρ:-0.470, p < 0.001; ρ: 0.521, p < 0.001; respectively) and moderate correlation between MAE (ρ:-0.394, p < 0.05). The highest correlation is observed with R2. Conclusions RMSE, MSE, POC, MAE, and especially R2, may quantitatively express upper eyelid symmetry, comparable with the oculoplastic surgeon. The highest correlation was observed between the senior surgeon and R2 and decreases with the experience of the surgeon.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Eyelid Contour Following Conjunctival Müllerectomy With or Without Tarsectomy Blepharoptosis RepairOphthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2016
- Analysis of Surgical Outcome After Levator Advancement by Assessing Changes in Eyelid ContourJournal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2016
- Analysis of Lid Contour in Thyroid Eye Disease With Upper and Lower Eyelid Retraction Using Multiple Radial Midpupil Lid DistancesJournal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2016
- Analysis of Lid Contour Change with Aging in Asians by Measuring Midpupil Lid DistancePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2014
- The Expression and Comparison of Healthy and Ptotic Upper Eyelid Contours Using a Polynomial Mathematical FunctionCurrent Eye Research, 2014
- Pre- and Postoperative Quantitative Analysis of Contour Abnormalities in Graves Upper Eyelid RetractionOphthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
- Multiple Radial Midpupil Lid Distances: A Simple Method for Lid Contour AnalysisOphthalmology, 2012
- Digital Image Analysis to Characterize the Upper Lid Marginal Peak After Levator Aponeurosis RepairOphthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2011
- The Geometrical Basis of the Eyelid ContourOphthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2000
- Digital image processing measurement of the upper eyelid contour in graves disease and congenital blepharoptosisOphthalmology, 1998