A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy
Authors:
- Jeremy KnoxJKJeremy Knox
- Richard BibbRichard Bibb
- Alexei I. ZhurovAlexei I. Zhurov
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Orthodontics
- Vol. 35 (3) , 191-201
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of a three-dimensional (3D) optical laser-scanning device to record the surface detail of plaster study models. To determine the accuracy of physical model replicas constructed from the 3D digital files.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: Comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurementsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2006
- Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster modelsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2003
- Accuracy of a System for Creating 3D Computer Models of Dental ArchesJournal of Dental Research, 2003
- Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applicationsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2002
- Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual groupingIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2001
- Construction of 3-D Shape of Orthodontic Dental Casts Measured from Two Directions.Dental Materials Journal, 1998
- Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanningAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1996
- Holograms and Study Models Assessed by the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Index of Malocclusion—A Pilot StudyBritish Journal of Orthodontics, 1993
- Storage of Orthodontic Study Models in Hospital Units in the U.K.British Journal of Orthodontics, 1992
- Errors and Discrepancies in Measurement of Tooth SizeJournal of Dental Research, 1960