Crop pollination management needs flower‐visitor monitoring and target values
Open Access
- 22 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Ecology
- Vol. 57 (4) , 664-670
Abstract
Despite the crucial importance of biotic pollination for many crops, land managers rarely monitor the levels of crop pollination needed to guide farming decisions. The few existing pollination recommendations focus on a particular number of honeybee or bumblebee hives per crop area, but these guidelines do not accurately predict the actual pollination services that crops receive. We argue that pollination management for pollinator‐dependent crops should be based on direct measures of pollinator activity. We describe a protocol to quickly perform such a task by monitoring flower visitation rates. We provide target values of visitation rates for crop yield maximization for several important crops by considering the number of visits per flower needed to ensure full ovule fertilization. If visitation rates are well below or above these target values, corrective measures should be taken. Detailed additional data on visitation rates for different species, morpho‐species, or groups of species and/or flower‐visitor richness can improve pollination estimates. Synthesis and applications. We present target values of visitation rates for some globally important pollinator‐dependent crops and provide guidance on why monitoring the number and diversity of pollinators is important, and how this information can be used for decision‐making. The implementation of flower monitoring programmes will improve management in many aspects, including enhanced quality and quantity of crop yield and a more limited spillover of managed (often exotic) pollinators from crop areas into native habitats, reducing their many potential negative impacts.Keywords
Funding Information
- Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2015‐2333)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visitsEcology Letters, 2011
- Natural and within-farmland biodiversity enhances crop productivityEcology Letters, 2011
- Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yieldProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2008
- Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service managementEcology Letters, 2005
- Collection, Germination and Storage of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.) Pollen for Pollination under Temperate ConditionsAsian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2004
- Dose‐response relationships between pollination and fruiting refine pollinator comparisons for cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon [Ericaceae])American Journal of Botany, 2003
- Relationships Between Blueberry Flower Age, Pollination, and Conidial Infection byMonilinia vaccinii-corymbosiPhytopathology®, 2002
- Comparative Pollination Effectiveness Among Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) on Lowbush Blueberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium angustifolium)Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2002
- Papillar integrity as an indicator of stigmatic receptivity in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)Journal of Experimental Botany, 1995
- Changes in the Anatomy and Receptivity of Pistils after Anthesis in Strawberry.Engei gakkai zasshi (Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science), 1991