Empirical evidence of bias in infertility research: overestimation of treatment effect in crossover trials using pregnancy as the outcome measure
Authors:
- Khalid S. KhanKhalid S. Khan
- Salim DayaSDSalim Daya
- John A. CollinsJCJohn A. Collins
- Stephen D. WalterSWStephen D. Walter
- 1 May 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 65 (5) , 939-945
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clomid for Unexplained Infertility? Simple Lie or Complicated Truth?Fertility and Sterility, 1994
- Treatments of male infertilityHuman Reproduction, 1994
- Treatments of male infertilityHuman Reproduction, 1994
- Infertility treatment: from cookery to science. The epidemiology of randomised controlled trialsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1993
- Infertility:Treatment of male infertility: is it effective? Review and meta-analyses of published randomized controlled trialsHuman Reproduction, 1993
- Is there a place for the crossover design in infertility trials?Fertility and Sterility, 1993
- The Two-Period Crossover Design in Medical ResearchAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989
- Crossover and Self-Controlled Designs in Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The two‐period cross‐over clinical trial.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1979