Differential Grading Standards and University Funding: Evidence from Italy
- 28 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in CESifo Economic Studies
- Vol. 54 (2) , 149-176
Abstract
This article documents that grades vary significantly across Italian public universities and degrees. We provide evidence suggesting that these differences reflect the heterogeneity of grading standards. A straightforward implication of this result is that university funding schemes based on students' academic performance do not necessary favour universities that generate higher value added. We test this for the case of the Italian funds allocation system, which rewards universities according to the number of exams passed by their students. We find that university departments that rank higher according to this indicator actually tend to be significantly worse in terms of their graduates' performance in the labour market. (JEL codes: I2, J31, J64)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Returns to skills, incentives to study and optimal educational standardsJournal of Economics, 2007
- Grade Divergence as a Market OutcomeThe Journal of Economic Education, 1999
- Degrees of difference: variability of degree results in UK universitiesHigher Education, 1997
- Grade Inflation and Course ChoiceJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1991
- Differential Grading Standards RevisitedJournal of Educational Measurement, 1987
- Grade Inflation, Real Income, Simultaneity, and Teaching EvaluationsThe Journal of Economic Education, 1984
- Grade inflation in higher education: A comparative studyResearch in Higher Education, 1981