International Travel for Organ Transplantation: Provider and Patient Perspectives
Authors:
- Ann B. NguyenANAnn B. Nguyen
- Hannah F. RothHRHannah F. Roth
- Bow ChungBCBow Chung
- Daniel Ba RodgersDRDaniel Ba Rodgers
- Kevin J. ClerkinKCKevin J. Clerkin
- Gabriel SayerGSGabriel Sayer
- Gene KimGKGene Kim
- Valluvan JeevanandamVJValluvan Jeevanandam
- Mark SieglerMSMark Siegler
- Nir UrielNUNir Uriel
- Andrew AronsohnAAAndrew Aronsohn
Open Access
- 18 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation Direct
- Vol. 10 (8) , e1686
Abstract
Background.: Organ allocation in the United States to non-US citizen, non-US residents who travel for transplant (NC/NRTx) is controversial. Current policies may not be informed by stakeholder opinions, as limited data exist assessing the knowledge or opinions of providers or patients on this issue. Methods.: A cross-sectional, hospital-based pilot survey was distributed to providers and patients from December 2019 to June 2020 at a single large urban transplant institute. Providers were members of the departments of surgery and medicine and included both transplant and nontransplant providers. Surveys included 10 questions on eligibility, prioritization, and limitations for deceased donor transplantation and 12 demographic questions. Results.: A total of 209 providers responded (61% women, median age 40) and 119 patients responded (62% women, median age 54). Awareness of eligibility for transplantation of US citizens, non-US citizens residing in the United States (NC/R), and NC/NRTx was high in both groups, though providers and patients lacked awareness of the eligibility of nonlegal NC/R (those who live in the United States who are not citizens and are not legal residents) to donate and receive organs. Overall, 79.3% of patients stated that NC/NRTx should be eligible for transplant in the United States compared with only 60.7% of providers (P = 0.001). Providers were more likely than patients to prioritize transplant to legal NC/NR over NC/NRTx (58.2% versus 35.1%, P < 000.1) and reported that families should be able to limit donations to NC/NRTx (34.9% versus 23.2%, P = 0.03). Conclusions.: Surveyed patients and providers generally support transplant in non-US citizens; however, the strength of support varied considerably based on the legal status of the patient and the occupation of those surveyed. Larger studies are necessary to develop data-informed policy.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- International Travel for Liver Transplantation: A Comprehensive Assessment of the Impact on the United States Transplant SystemTransplantation, 2021
- Transplantation in foreign nationals: Need for greater transparencyAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2019
- Organ Transplantation for Foreign Nationals in Canada: A Survey of Transplant ProfessionalsCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, 2019
- Liver transplants for noncitizens/nonresidents: What is the problem, and what should be done?American Journal of Transplantation, 2018
- Transplantation in foreign nationals: Lower rates of waitlist mortality and higher rates of lost to follow-up posttransplantAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2018
- Deceased Donor Organ Transplantation Performed in the United States for Noncitizens and NonresidentsTransplantation, 2018
- Liver Allocation to Non-U.S. Citizen Non-U.S. Residents: An Ethical Framework for a Last-in-Line ApproachAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2016
- Organ Transplantation for Nonresidents of the United States: A Policy for TransparencyAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2014
- Foreigners Traveling to the U.S. for Transplantation May Adversely Affect Organ Donation: A National SurveyAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2010
- Organ trafficking and transplant tourism and commercialism: the Declaration of IstanbulThe Lancet, 2008