Informing Implementation Strategies for Pharmacogenomics in Cancer: Development of Survey Tools for Healthcare Professionals and Consumers
Open Access
- 18 March 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Translational Science
- Vol. 18 (3) , e70144
Abstract
Integration of clinical pharmacogenomics (PGx) within routine cancer care is limited despite frequent use of medicines impacted by PGx, evidence for the benefits of PGx, and the availability of international PGx clinical guidelines. Our study objective was to develop survey tools to assess PGx knowledge, attitudes, practices, perceptions, and education needs among (a) doctors, nurses, and pharmacists involved in cancer care (healthcare professionals, HCPs) and (b) adults who have received cancer treatment or their carers (consumers), with the view to informing implementation strategies for PGx in solid and hematologic cancers. Survey tools were developed in a three‐phase (ph) mixed‐methods approach. Content was informed by systematic literature review findings and framed by determinants of behavior as informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (ph‐1). Refinement occurred through four separate priority partnership meetings (ph‐2). Meetings focused on clinical PGx practices within select cancer streams, and consumers' knowledge, attitudes, and preferences for PGx testing. Content/face validity and health literacy (Flesch Kincaid Grade Level) assessments informed final refinements (ph‐3). Separate HCP and consumer survey tools were developed with six common sections: (1) introduction; (2) demographics; (3) experience; (4) knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceptions; (5) education; and (6) vignettes. Content and face validity were rated highly with acceptable health literacy assessments for questions within the consumer survey (median grade level 6; range 1–8). The developed survey tools will be used to generate evidence to inform local implementation strategies for PGx in cancer and promote broader integration of pharmacogenomics in routine clinical care.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practical Barriers and Facilitators Experienced by Patients, Pharmacists and Physicians to the Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Screening in Dutch Outpatient Hospital Care—An Explorative Pilot StudyJournal of Personalized Medicine, 2020
- Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic reviewBMC Health Services Research, 2020
- Assessing the Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Panel-Testing in Primary Care in the Netherlands Utilizing a Theoretical FrameworkJournal of Clinical Medicine, 2020
- Pharmacogenetic Testing in Primary Care Practice: Opinions of Physicians, Pharmacists and PatientsPharmacogenomics, 2019
- Implementation and obstacles of pharmacogenetics in clinical practice: An international surveyBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2019
- Development and validation of measurement tools for user experience evaluation surveys in the public primary healthcare facilities in Greece: a mixed methods studyBMC Family Practice, 2019
- A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problemsImplementation Science, 2017
- Characterizing Pharmacogenomic‐Guided Medication Use With a Clinical Data RepositoryClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2017
- Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation researchImplementation Science, 2014
- A single point mutation leading to loss of catalytic activity in human thiopurine S-methyltransferase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1995