Synergizing Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) Chatbots in a Process-Based Writing Paradigm to Enhance University Students’ Writing Skills
Open Access
- 30 September 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Journal of Language and Education
- Vol. 10 (3) , 79-94
Abstract
Background: The combination of the process-based writing framework and GPT-based chatbots establishes a dynamic and interactive environment, leading students through the stages of planning, drafting, revising, and editing. This collaborative approach not only elevates writing skills but also cultivates critical thinking and self-reflection, thereby transforming the writing process into a more effective and engaging learning experience. Despite the potential synergy to revolutionize the writing process, there exists a surprising lack of research within the educational domain exploring the impact of this innovative approach. Purpose: This study investigates the influence of a GPT-based chatbot within a process-based writing framework on university EFL students’ writing skills, specifically focusing on components such as organization, content, coherence-cohesion, logical connection, and argumentation. Method: Employing a sequential mixed methods type of research with a pre- and post-test design, 30 university EFL students were selected via purposive sampling technique. They engaged in 10 sessions that incorporated GPT-based chatbots within a process-based writing framework. Data collections were through pre-and post- writing tests, writing quizzes, and semi-structured interviews. Results: The results highlighted substantial improvements in participants’ writing performance, evident through a noteworthy increase in post-writing test scores (x̄=17.03) in comparison to pre-writing test scores (x̄=9.13). The study identified a progressive enhancement in four out of five writing components - organization, content, coherence-cohesion, and argumentation - across the 1st to 4th quizzes. However, the ‘logical connection’ component experienced a temporary decline during the 2nd and 3rd writing quizzes, rebounding significantly in the 4th quiz. Notably, the most improved writing components were ‘content’ and ‘argumentation,’ while the component related to ‘logical connection’ exhibited the least improved one. Qualitative findings further underscored participants’ acknowledgment of the effectiveness of the strategy in facilitating their writing tasks. Conclusion: The integration of chatbots within a writing framework was concluded as a facilitative pedagogical approach, fostering a dynamic, personalized, and effective learning experience, contributing to the multifaceted improvement of their writing skills. As educators and practitioners consider innovative approaches, this study provides a compelling case for the effective utilization of GPT-based chatbots in fostering language proficiency and a more engaging learning experience.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Enhancing Chinese Language Writing Skill Through Virtual Process-Based Writing Approach of Thai Undergraduate Students, Thailand2024
- Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classroomsAssessing Writing, 2023
- Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essayELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 2023
- Chatbots applications in education: A systematic reviewComputers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2021
- An Educational Chatbot for Answering Queries2019
- Understanding L1 and L2 interaction in collaborative writing: A lexico-grammatical analysisLanguage Teaching Research, 2019
- Supporting the Writing Process with Technology for Students with DisabilitiesIntervention in School and Clinic, 2019
- Technology and L2 Writing2017
- The Effect of the Process Writing Approach on Writing Success and AnxietyEducational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2014
- Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: a meta-analysis of research findingsReading and Writing, 2011