The Promising Future of Class Analysis: A Response to Recent Critiques
Authors:
- John H. GoldthorpeJGJohn H. Goldthorpe
- Gordon MarshallGMGordon Marshall
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociology
- Vol. 26 (3) , 381-400
Abstract
Class analysis has recently been criticised from a variety of standpoints. In this paper we argue that much of this criticism is misplaced and that, as a research programme, the promise of class analysis is far from exhausted. The first part of the paper clarifies the nature and purpose of class analysis, as we would understand it, and in particular distinguishes it from the class analysis of Marxist sociology. The second part then makes the case for the continuing relevance of class analysis, in our conception of it, by reviewing findings from three central areas of current research.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- ARE SOCIAL CLASSES DYING?International Sociology, 1991
- On the Usefulness of Class Analysis in Research on Social Mobility and Socioeconomic InequalityActa Sociologica, 1991
- R.E. Pahl repliesInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1991
- Class dealignment and the explanation of political change: A reply to DunleavyWest European Politics, 1988
- Class Dealignment in Britain RevisitedWest European Politics, 1987
- Trendless Fluctuation: A Reply to CrewePolitical Studies, 1987
- On the Death and Resurrection of Class Voting: Some Comments on How Britain VotesPolitical Studies, 1986
- The Social Class Structure of Occupational MobilityAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981
- Temporal Change in Occupational Mobility: Evidence for Men in the United StatesAmerican Sociological Review, 1975
- Theories of Industrial Society: reflections on the recrudescence of historicism and the future of futurologyEuropean Journal of Sociology, 1971