Evaluation and improvement of tail behaviour in the cumulative distribution function transform downscaling method
Open Access
- 10 December 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Climatology
- Vol. 39 (4) , 2449-2460
Abstract
The cumulative distribution function transform (CDFt) downscaling method has been used widely to provide local‐scale information and bias correction to output from physical climate models. The CDFt approach is one from the category of statistical downscaling methods that operates via transformations between statistical distributions. Although numerous studies have demonstrated that such methods provide value overall, much less effort has focused on their performance with regard to values in the tails of distributions. We evaluate the performance of CDFt‐generated tail values based on four distinct approaches, two native to CDFt and two of our own creation, in the context of a “Perfect Model” setting in which global climate model output is used as a proxy for both observational and model data. We find that the native CDFt approaches can have sub‐optimal performance in the tails, particularly with regard to the maximum value. However, our alternative approaches provide substantial improvement.Keywords
Funding Information
- U.S. Geological Survey (G13AC00387)
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamical and statistical downscaling of the French Mediterranean climate: uncertainty assessmentNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2012
- Are regional climate models relevant for crop yield prediction in West Africa?Environmental Research Letters, 2011
- Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end userReviews of Geophysics, 2010
- Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modellingInternational Journal of Climatology, 2007
- The variability of the horizontal circulation in the troposphere and stratosphere - a comparisonTheoretical and Applied Climatology, 2001
- Estimates of Spatial Degrees of FreedomJournal of Climate, 1995
- The Jackknife and the Bootstrap for General Stationary ObservationsThe Annals of Statistics, 1989
- Seasonal Temperature Predictions Using a Jackknife Approach with an Intraseasonal Variability IndexMonthly Weather Review, 1986
- Specification of Seasonal-Mean 700 mb Heights over North America by North Pacific and North Atlantic Sea Surface TemperaturesMonthly Weather Review, 1984
- The Interpretation and Estimation of Effective Sample SizeJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 1984