The impact of social distancing on COVID19 spread: State of Georgia case study
Authors:
- Pinar KeskinocakPKPinar Keskinocak
- Buse Eylul OrucBOBuse Eylul Oruc
- Arden BaxterABArden Baxter
- John AsplundJAJohn Asplund
- Nicoleta SerbanNSNicoleta Serban
Preprint
Abstract
As the spread of COVID19 in the US continues to grow, local and state officials face difficult decisions about when and how to transition to a “new normal.” The goal of this study is to project the number of COVID19 infections and resulting severe outcomes, and the need for hospital capacity under social distancing, particularly, shelter-in-place and voluntary quarantine for the State of Georgia. We developed an agent-based simulation model to project the infection spread. The model utilizes COVID19-specific parameters and data from Georgia on population interactions and demographics. The simulation study covered a seven and a half-month period, testing different social distancing scenarios, including baselines (no-intervention or school closure only) and combinations of shelter-in-place and voluntary quarantine with different timelines and compliance levels. The following outcomes are compared at the state and community levels: the number and percentage of cumulative and daily new symptomatic and asymptomatic infections, hospitalizations, and deaths; COVID19-related demand for hospital beds, ICU beds, and ventilators. The results suggest that shelter-in-place followed by voluntary quarantine reduced peak infections from approximately 180K under no intervention and 113K under school closure, respectively, to below 53K, and delayed the peak from April to July or later. Increasing shelter-in-place duration from four to five weeks yielded 2-9% and 3-11% decrease in cumulative infection and deaths, respectively. Regardless of the shelter-in-place duration, increasing voluntary quarantine compliance decreased daily new infections from almost 53K to 25K, and decreased cumulative infections by about 50%. The cumulative number of deaths ranged from 6,660 to 19,430 under different scenarios. Peak infection date varied across scenarios and counties; on average, increasing shelter-in-place duration delayed the peak day by 6 days. Overall, shelter-in-place followed by voluntary quarantine substantially reduced COVID19 infections, healthcare resource needs, and severe outcomes.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: PLOS ONE, 15 (10), e0239798.
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Principal component analysisNature Methods, 2017
- The Effects of School Closures on Influenza Outbreaks and Pandemics: Systematic Review of Simulation StudiesPLOS ONE, 2014
- Modeling Influenza Pandemic and Planning Food DistributionManufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2014
- Social contact patterns and control strategies for influenza in the elderlyMathematical Biosciences, 2012
- Controlling epidemic spread by social distancing: Do it well or not at allBMC Public Health, 2012
- Intermittent social distancing strategy for epidemic controlPhysical Review E, 2012
- The impact of mass gatherings and holiday traveling on the course of an influenza pandemic: a computational modelBMC Public Health, 2010
- Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious DiseasesPLOS Medicine, 2008
- Reducing the Impact of the Next Influenza Pandemic Using Household-Based Public Health InterventionsPLOS Medicine, 2006
- Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast AsiaNature, 2005