Dopamine or opioid stimulation of nucleus accumbens similarly amplify cue‐triggered ‘wanting’ for reward: entire core and medial shell mapped as substrates for PIT enhancement
- 17 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 37 (9) , 1529-1540
Abstract
Pavlovian cues [conditioned stimulus (CS+)] often trigger intense motivation to pursue and consume related reward [unconditioned stimulus (UCS)]. But cues do not always trigger the same intensity of motivation. Encountering a reward cue can be more tempting on some occasions than on others. What makes the same cue trigger more intense motivation to pursue reward on a particular encounter? The answer may be the level of incentive salience (‘wanting’) that is dynamically generated by mesocorticolimbic brain systems, influenced especially by dopamine and opioid neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) at that moment. We tested the ability of dopamine stimulation (by amphetamine microinjection) vs. mu opioid stimulation [by d‐Ala, nMe‐Phe, Glyol‐enkephalin (DAMGO) microinjection] of either the core or shell of the NAc to amplify cue‐triggered levels of motivation to pursue sucrose reward, measured with a Pavlovian‐Instrumental Transfer (PIT) procedure, a relatively pure assay of incentive salience. Cue‐triggered ‘wanting’ in PIT was enhanced by amphetamine or DAMGO microinjections equally, and also equally at nearly all sites throughout the entire core and medial shell (except for a small far‐rostral strip of shell). NAc dopamine/opioid stimulations specifically enhanced CS+ ability to trigger phasic peaks of ‘wanting’ to obtain UCS, without altering baseline efforts when CS+ was absent. We conclude that dopamine/opioid stimulation throughout nearly the entire NAc can causally amplify the reactivity of mesocorticolimbic circuits, and so magnify incentive salience or phasic UCS ‘wanting’ peaks triggered by a CS+. Mesolimbic amplification of incentive salience may explain why a particular cue encounter can become irresistibly tempting, even when previous encounters were successfully resisted before.Keywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- Which cue to ‘want’? Opioid stimulation of central amygdala makes goal-trackers show stronger goal-tracking, just as sign-trackers show stronger sign-trackingBehavioural Brain Research, 2012
- Differential dopamine release dynamics in the nucleus accumbens core and shell track distinct aspects of goal-directed behavior for sucroseNeuropharmacology, 2012
- Dopamine Receptor Blockade Attenuates the General Incentive Motivational Effects of Noncontingently Delivered Rewards and Reward-Paired Cues Without Affecting Their Ability to Bias Action SelectionNeuropsychopharmacology, 2011
- A selective role for dopamine in stimulus–reward learningNature, 2010
- Reversible suppression of food reward behavior by chronic mu-opioid receptor antagonism in the nucleus accumbensNeuroscience, 2010
- Hypothesis-driven structural connectivity analysis supports network over hierarchical model of brain architectureProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Separable Roles of the Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell in Context- and Cue-Induced Alcohol-SeekingNeuropsychopharmacology, 2009
- Convergent, not serial, striatal and pallidal circuits regulate opioid-induced food intakeNeuroscience, 2009
- Emotional environments retune the valence of appetitive versus fearful functions in nucleus accumbensNature Neuroscience, 2008
- Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complexBrain Research Reviews, 2007