Consensus Statement: Cardiovascular Safety Profile of Triptans (5‐HT1B/1D Agonists) in the Acute Treatment of Migraine
Authors:
- Richard B. LiptonRLRichard B. Lipton
- Vincent MartinVMVincent Martin
- Vasilios PapademetriouVPVasilios Papademetriou
- Wayne RosamondWRWayne Rosamond
- Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrinkAMAntoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- Hassan LoutfiHLHassan Loutfi
- K.MIchael WelchKWK.MIchael Welch
- Peter J. GoadsbyPGPeter J. Goadsby
- Steven HahnSHSteven Hahn
- Susan HutchinsonSHSusan Hutchinson
- David MatcharDMDavid Matchar
Open Access
- 7 May 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
- Vol. 44 (5) , 414-425
Abstract
Background.—Health care providers frequently cite concerns about cardiovascular safety of the triptans as a barrier to their use. In 2002, the American Headache Society convened the Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel to evaluate the evidence on triptan‐associated cardiovascular risk and to formulate consensus recommendations for making informed decisions for their use in patients with migraine.Objective.—To summarize the evidence reviewed by the Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel and their recommendations for the use of triptans in clinical practice.Participants.—The Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel was composed of a multidisciplinary group of experts in neurology, primary care, cardiology, pharmacology, women's health, and epidemiology.Evidence and Consensus Process.—An exhaustive search of the relevant published literature was reviewed by each panel member in preparation for an open roundtable meeting. Pertinent issues (eg, cardiovascular pharmacology of triptans, epidemiology of cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk assessment, migraine) were presented as a prelude to group discussion and formulation of consensus conclusions and recommendations. Follow‐up meetings were held by telephone.Conclusions.—(1) Most of the data on triptans are derived from patients without known coronary artery disease. (2) Chest symptoms occurring during use of triptans are generally nonserious and are not explained by ischemia. (3) The incidence of serious cardiovascular events with triptans in both clinical trials and clinical practice appears to be extremely low. (4) The cardiovascular risk‐benefit profile of triptans favors their use in the absence of contraindications.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of High-Dose Intravenous Eletriptan on Coronary Artery DiameterCephalalgia, 2004
- Tolerability of sumatriptan: clinical trials and post-marketing experienceCephalalgia, 2000
- Tolerability and Efficacy of Naratriptan Tablets in the Acute Treatment of Migraine Attacks for 1 YearCephalalgia, 2000
- An association between migraine and cutaneous allodyniaAnnals of Neurology, 2000
- Oral Rizatriptan Versus Oral Sumatriptan: A Direct Comparative Study in the Acute Treatment of MigraineHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1998
- Rizatriptan (MAXALT) for the Acute Treatment of Migraine and Migraine Recurrence. A Placebo‐Controlled, Outpatient StudyHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1998
- Naratriptan is Effective and Well Tolerated in the Acute Treatment of Migraine. Results of a Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Parallel‐Group StudyHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1997
- 5‐HT1D receptor agonists and human coronary artery reactivity in vitro: crossover comparisons of 5‐HT and sumatriptan with rizatriptan and L‐741,519British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1996
- Familial Migraine and Coronary Artery spasm in two siblingsClinical Cardiology, 1986
- Is Variant Angina the Coronary Manifestation of a Generalized Vasospastic Disorder?New England Journal of Medicine, 1981