Ethnography of Africa: The Usefulness of the Useless
Author:
- 1 June 1978
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Anthropologist
- Vol. 80 (2) , 310-334
Abstract
The complex epistemological and methodological problems of data‐quality control or ethnographer bias in anthropological research as they relate to the use of the native languages and/or the use of native‐interpreter informants are critically reexamined. Summarizing the 1939–1940 Mead‐Lowie debate, the paper suggests, on the basis of a close review of selected classic ethnographies of Africa, various ways by which the quality of comparative cross‐cultural data could be meaningfully improved. [methodology of cross‐cultural research, epistemological issues in anthropology, use of native languages in fieldwork, ethnography of Africa, history of anthropology]Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issues in the Ethics of Research Method: An Interpretation of the Anglo-American Perspective [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1976
- Policy Studies, Development, and Political AnthropologyThe Journal of Modern African Studies, 1975
- Dominant Epistemological Presuppositions in the Use of the Cross-Cultural Survey Method [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1975
- Comment: Traditions of GenesisThe Journal of African History, 1974
- Enthnography and Administration: a Study of Anglo-Tiv ‘Working Misunderstanding’The Journal of African History, 1974
- Ethnographer Bias in Cross-Cultural Research: An Empirical StudyBehavior Science Notes, 1973
- Prejudice and Its Intellectual Effect in American Anthropology: An Ethnographic Report1American Anthropologist, 1973
- Colonial chiefs in a stateless society: a case-study from Northern UgandaThe Journal of African History, 1973
- What Have We Learned from Cross‐Cultural Surveys?1American Anthropologist, 1970
- NATIVE LANGUAGES AS ETHNOGRAPHIC TOOLSAmerican Anthropologist, 1940