Experience with alternative material for nasal augmentation
Author:
- Leo Z. Giedrojc JurahaLJLeo Z. Giedrojc Juraha
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 16 (2) , 133-140
Abstract
In the last six years, 101 Proplast 11 implants were used for correcting various nasal deformities. The time of observation ranged from one to six years. During this period, four implants were removed: two because of late postoperative infection and two others because of trauma. Our experience indicates that Proplast 11 is a good alternative in cases that require alloplastic implants to correct an existing nasal deformity.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aesthetic Augmentation of the Malar-Midface StructuresPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1987
- The Use of Alloplast Material in Contouring the FaceFacial Plastic Surgery, 1986
- The Application of Dermis Grafts in Deformities of the NosePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1983
- Temporalis Fascial GraftsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1980
- Treatment of Shallow Soft Tissue Ulcers with an Infrequent Dressing TechniqueAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1980
- Clinical Experiences with Proplast as an ImplantPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1979
- SOFT TISSUE RESPONSE TO PROPLASTPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1978
- AUGMENTATION RHINOPLASTY IN THE ORIENTALSPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1964
- A DESIC.N FOR A PROSTHESIS IN AUGMENTATIVE RHINOPLASTYPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1964
- Comparative study of ivory and organic transplants in rhinoplasty. Endonasal operative technic of some nasal deformities with report of casesThe Laryngoscope, 1924