A Combination of Electroencephalogram and Auditory Evoked Potentials Separates Different Levels of Anesthesia in Volunteers
Authors:
- Stefanie PilgeSPStefanie Pilge
- Eberhard F. KochsEKEberhard F. Kochs
- Gudrun StockmannsGSGudrun Stockmanns
- Andreas HockAHAndreas Hock
- Gerhard SchneiderGSGerhard Schneider
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 108 (5) , 1512-1521
Abstract
It has been shown that the combination of electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory evoked potentials (AEP) allows a good separation of consciousness from unconsciousness. In the present study, we sought a combined EEG/AEP indicator that allows both separation of consciousness from unconsciousness and discrimination among different levels of sedation and hypnosis over a wider range of anesthesia. Fifteen unpremedicated volunteers received mono-anesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol in a randomized crossover design in two consecutive sessions. Loss of consciousness (LOC) and EEG burst suppression (BSP) defined end-points from the upper and lower range of general anesthesia. In addition to those two extremes, the difference between anesthetic concentration at BSP and LOC was divided into three equal intervals, resulting in two intermediate levels which divided the concentration from LOC (minimum) to BSP (maximum) into three equal steps. This data set was used to test whether a previously described combined EEG/AEP indicator "detector of consciousness" can also discriminate among degrees of anesthetic effects from the awake state to BSP. Furthermore, a new improved combined EEG/AEP indicator was developed on the basis of the data from the current study, and subsequently this new indicator was tested for its ability to separate consciousness from unconsciousness with the patient data set. The former "detector of consciousness" showed a prediction probability (P(K)) of 0.77 to separate different levels of anesthesia from the current study, whereas for the new combined EEG/AEP indicator, P(K) was 0.94. The new indicator was further applied to the previous study and achieved a P(K) of 0.89. These results show that with the new indicator presented here, a combination of EEG and AEP parameters can be used to differentiate degrees of anesthetic effects over a wide range of hypnosis, from the conscious state to deep anesthesia (i.e., BSP).Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- NeuMonD: a tool for the development of new indicators of anaesthetic effectBiomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik, 2007
- EEG parameters and their combination as indicators of depth of anaesthesia / EEG-Parameter und deren Kombination für das NarkosemonitoringBiomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik, 2006
- Detection of Consciousness by Electroencephalogram and Auditory Evoked PotentialsAnesthesiology, 2005
- Mid-latency auditory evoked response during propofol and alfentanil anaesthesiaBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004
- Wavelet Analysis of Middle Latency Auditory Evoked ResponsesAnesthesiology, 2001
- Discrimination of Anesthetic States using Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potential and Artificial Neural NetworksAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2001
- Auditory evoked responses and learning and awareness during general anesthesiaActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2000
- Evoked responses in anaesthesiaBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1998
- Monitoring evoked potentials during surgery to assess the level of anaesthesiaJournal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 1995
- THE AUDITORY EVOKED RESPONSE AS AN INDICATOR OF AWARENESSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1989