Association of Agro‐Morphological Traits With Cup Quality in Accessions of Coffea arabica L. From the INIA Germplasm Bank, Peru
Authors:
- Ronald Pio Carrera‐RojoRCRonald Pio Carrera‐Rojo
- José Antonio Ramírez‐PeraltaJRJosé Antonio Ramírez‐Peralta
- José Manuel Cornejo‐HerreraJCJosé Manuel Cornejo‐Herrera
- José Reategui‐VegaJRJosé Reategui‐Vega
- Itnan Oscco‐MedinaIOItnan Oscco‐Medina
- Jazmín Yurema Maraví‐LoyolaJMJazmín Yurema Maraví‐Loyola
- L. David Huayta‐HinojosaLHL. David Huayta‐Hinojosa
Open Access
- 5 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment
- Vol. 5 (2)
Abstract
In recent years, Peruvian coffee production has increasingly focused on specialty coffees, with cup quality (CQ) as a key criterion. While previous studies have characterized the Coffee Germplasm Collection of the National Institute of Agrarian Innovation (CGC‐INIA), few studies have analyzed coffee cup quality. The present study assessed the association between agro‐morphological traits and sensory quality of CGC‐INIA. A total of 123 accessions from six departments were evaluated during two crop seasons (2022–2023 and 2023–2024). Fourteen agro‐morphological traits (morphological, reproductive, and phytosanitary) and cup quality were recorded. Mean cup quality of the accessions was 81.56 points, which is classified as “very good” according to the Specialty Coffee Association. Most traits remained stable across seasons, except for fruit production and two phytosanitary traits (leaf miner infestation and rust incidence). Correlation analysis showed weak associations between individual agro‐morphological traits and CQ ( r < 0.3). Principal component analysis explained 28.6% of the total variance in the first two components, indicating limited overall association between agro‐morphological variation and sensory quality. Generalized linear model results showed that Plant height (PH) and young shoot color (YSC) were the only traits positively associated with CQ. However, the weak associations and small effect sizes indicate that PH and YSC should be considered complementary indicators in CQ evaluation, and only within integrated selection frameworks that combine phenotypic, genetic, environmental, and management factors to improve specialty coffee quality.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phenology of Coffea canephora from different maturation cyclesAgronomy Journal, 2025
- Ecology and management of the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei): the potential of biological controlBioControl, 2024
- Agro‐morphological characterization and diversity analysis of Coffea arabica germplasm collection from INIA, PeruCrop Science, 2023
- Pests and diseases regulation in coffee agroecosystems by management systems and resistance in changing climate conditions: a reviewJournal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2022
- Effects of coffee roasting technologies on cup quality and bioactive compounds of specialty coffee beansFood Science & Nutrition, 2020
- “Coffee Bean-Related” Agroecological Factors Affecting the Coffee2018
- Coffee quality and its relationship with Brix degree and colorimetric information of coffee cherriesPrecision Agriculture, 2014
- Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian modelsStatistics and Computing, 2013
- Morphological Basis for Identification of Cup Quality Characteristics in F1 Hybrids Derived from Coffea arabica L. Crosses2012
- Fruit thinning and shade improve bean characteristics and beverage quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) under optimal conditionsJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2005