Deep Learning–Based Choroidal Boundary Detection in Geographic Atrophy Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Authors:
- Elham RahmanipourElham Rahmanipour
- Nasiq HasanNasiq Hasan
- Adarsh GadariAdarsh Gadari
- James WhitleyJames Whitley
- Rhea SharmaRhea Sharma
- Shreyaa LallShreyaa Lall
- Cristian de Los SantosCristian de Los Santos
- Elham SadeghiElham Sadeghi
- Sandeep Chandra BollepalliSandeep Chandra Bollepalli
- Kiran Kumar VupparaboinaKiran Kumar Vupparaboina
- Mario J SavariaMario J Savaria
- Jay ChhablaniJay Chhablani
Preprint
- 29 January 2026
- preprint
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the challenges and limitations of a deep learning model for automated choroidal boundary detection in eyes with geographic atrophy (GA) using Spectral-Domain OCT (SD-OCT), and to assess the workflow efficiency of an AI-assisted manual verification approach. Methods: In this retrospective study, total 5,723 scans (Heidelberg Spectralis) with GA were analyzed. A previously validated tool (NMI ChoroidAI) was used to segment the choroidal inner (CIB) and outer (COB) boundaries. We compared the "AI-assisted" workflow (automated segmentation followed by manual verification) against "manual segmentation only" in terms of accuracy and time consumption. Slice-wise boundary errors were graded as 0 (accurate), 1 (≤33% deviation), 2 (33–66% deviation), or 3 (>66% deviation). Outcomes included error rates and weighted F₁-score (and precision where applicable). Total time for manual-only segmentation versus AI-assisted verification was recorded .Inter-reader variability was assessed between the two readers using intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: For CIB, only 5.2% of B-scans showed any deviation (strictly accurate in 94.8%), with weighted F₁-score 0.97 and precision 1.00. COB was more error-prone: 19.0% of B-scans showed deviation, however, when minor deviations were considered acceptable, COB acceptability increased to 94.2% (i.e., 5.8% remained >33% deviated). Only 13.2% of B-scans required minor manual correction. For a 97-scan volume, processing time decreased from an average of 7 hours (manual only) to 45 minutes (AI + human verification), an approximate 90% reduction in manual effort. Inter-reader agreement was high (ICC 0.923 for CIB and 0.938 for COB). Conclusions: Although the deep learning model exhibits limitations in COB detection due to artifacts, it serves as a valuable assistive tool. Our model substantially reduces human effort, but mandatory human verification is required to correct boundary errors caused by hyper-transmission before use in clinical trials.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Choroidal biomarkers in age-related macular degenerationSurvey of Ophthalmology, 2024
- Structural OCT and OCT angiography biomarkers associated with the development and progression of geographic atrophy in AMDGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2024
- Residual learning for segmentation of the medical images in healthcareMeasurement: Sensors, 2023
- Fully-automated atrophy segmentation in dry age-related macular degeneration in optical coherence tomographyScientific Reports, 2021
- Clinically relevant deep learning for detection and quantification of geographic atrophy from optical coherence tomography: a model development and external validation studyThe Lancet Digital Health, 2021
- Incomplete Retinal Pigment Epithelial and Outer Retinal Atrophy in Age-Related Macular DegenerationOphthalmology, 2019
- Pachychoroid Geographic AtrophyOphthalmology Retina, 2018
- The Progression of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular DegenerationOphthalmology, 2018
- Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet Global Health, 2014
- The Epidemiology of Progression of Pure Geographic Atrophy: The Beaver Dam Eye StudyAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2008