Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Obeticholic Acid and Semaglutide in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have an increased risk of developing progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. As of now, there are no FDA-approved treatments for NAFLD/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or its associated fibrosis. Although many drugs are under clinical trial, both obeticholic acid (OCA) and semaglutide are among the few that have reached phase III clinical trials, but they were never compared. We decided to conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. A total of 6,589 articles were found after searching PubMed, OVID Embase, OVID Medline, PubMed Central, and clinicaltrials.gov. Only full-text peer-reviewed articles published in the past six years were put through the Cochrane bias assessment tool or the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool to screen for bias. After strict quality assessment, data from five randomized controlled trials (n=2,694) and three systematic reviews/meta-analysis (n=8,898) was extracted and included. The data extraction from these studies showed that semaglutide and OCA cause histological improvement, but NASH resolution is exclusive to semaglutide. Although high doses of OCA can cause dyslipidemia and severe pruritus, it is the only therapeutic that causes improvement in NASH-associated hepatic fibrosis. Semaglutide is the safest option among the two and leads to significant weight loss compared to OCA; thus, a better outcome on hepatic steatosis follows. The indications of each of these drugs should be based on the NAFLD activity score and NASH fibrosis stage. OCA should be used with caution among patients with hyperlipidemia and ischemic heart disease as it may make these conditions worst.

This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit: