Comparing orthodontic treatment outcome between orthodontists and general dentists with the ABO index
Authors:
- Suchitra NelsonSNSuchitra Nelson
- B. Douglas AmbermanBAB. Douglas Amberman
- Mark G. HansMHMark G. Hans
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 126 (5) , 544-548
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading systemAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2002
- Comparison of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes in Educational and Private Practice SettingsJournal of Dental Education, 2002
- An appraisal of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index and a suggested new weighting systemEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1999
- Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998
- The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficultyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1995
- The functional impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments: A long-term comparison in patients with “borderline,” equally susceptible class II malocclusionsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1994
- The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (peer assessment rating) indexBritish Dental Journal, 1993
- A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” Class II patientsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1992
- The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validityEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1992